I'd support any initiative that strengthens our relationship with the EU and puts distance between us and the US. The EU is of course far from perfect, but they seem to be the closest thing to a sane global power these days. It's past time for all countries to decide whether they're going to prioritise human rights and stability, or the whims of oligarchs, because the two seem to be mutually exclusive.
post
I like the idea of working around the US. But, I don't like that these trade deals are typically designed to help big businesses, not individuals. Like, even back in the good ol' days when NAFTA was in place, maybe Canadian businesses could import from the US without any tariffs. But, I, as an individual consumer, couldn't buy something from the US without being hit with a big duty payment. In addition, the deals often have things in them that prevent participating countries from having sane laws if those laws interfere with businesses at all. For example, the only reason that anti-circumvention measures exist in Canada is that it was a condition of trade deals that Canada adopt the worst parts of the DMCA.
Future deals should allow individual people to buy things cheaply overseas, and not just allow businesses to do that. They should also address the freer movement of people between countries. And, they shouldn't prevent countries from adding laws that protect people or the environment.
The world is slowly cutting off trade with the Untied States. And deservedly so. Put the Untied States on time out until it behaves
The European Union and a 12-nation Indo-Pacific bloc
Politico forgetting the UK is a CPTPP country as well.
I remember a lot of jokes from EU politicians about how silly an idea it was. How the turn tables eh?
No need to gloat. Youβre still not in the EU. Happy with your blue passport, eh?
Hmm, pretty sure there's been plenty of gloating from your side bud.
I started warning against Brexit around 2013, but I have to admit that witnessing the slomo carcrash since has had a few itoldyouso moments.
You've fallen for the propaganda I'm afraid. Goods trade is down, but services is up. Net effect is fuck all.

Yes you are right; it seems Iβve been listening too much to the guardian and my British friends who have lost their jobs. And to the man in the street that I talk to during my vacations in the uk. Mea culpa!
CPTPP is such a stupid name. Say what you will about the US, but at least they try to get good acronyms for everything
Its just a perfunctory acronym.
Same as the US ones ever were..
AUSFTA. BUSFTA. DRCFTA. CUSFTA. USCFTA. PUSTPA. TTIP. NAFTA. FTAA. USTFTA.
Yeah, they really roll off the tongue.
NAFTA wasnβt bad at all
The point of listing the others is that NAFTA being pointed to as a 'good sounding' or 'well-named' acronym is that it's completely by accident.
The US almost always titles their trade agreements [country initial]USF(ree)T(rade)A(greement), and their title becomes their acronym.
Near zero thought goes into it.
Captain PP.
It sounds like someone blowing a raspberry. The terrible name notwithstanding, I hope Carney can pull this off. I found him a bit disappointing in his first quasi-year in office but this would really deliver on his promise of Canada being a leader of the middle powers.
USMCA is better?
Watching a super power self destruct from within because of one grifter is quite an experience.
Donating to get Carney elected is one of the best political decisions Iβve ever made.
Legitimately Iβm proud of the work heβs done in under a year.
Canada is not broken, but we did need better leadership and to really come together and work as a team again.
I agree that we were on the edge of a disaster with Poilievre, but Carney is acting like a 2000's conservative wet dream on environnemental issues and in many other fields.
Nothing, I've just realize that everything is perfectly fine with the environment. My bad.
1 comment