Interesting take, I respect your opinion, even if I don't agree. I'd be interested in your take of having workers being able to have a say in where tax money is actually spent (I forget the term she used), that they are advocating for in Tulsa Oklahoma and is a system they use somewhere in Latin or south America (was it Argentina or something?).

If I looked at the video and interpreted in the most positive way, I did not hear that.

I understood taxation should be distributed differently in her view, the resulting funds should be distributed differently, and that people should be able own a house and have food. She clearly wants shared housing (but that was a side track and it could be fractional ownership I suppose but you could hear a different thing too).

She also seems to hold the opinion that capital is overvalued in the current system and work is undervalued. I guess that's hard to say, a person without any tools will not be able to build a truck so I reason machines are quite an important part of the mix. But maybe the logical contribution of capital should be disconnected from its societal value. We could tax capital a bit more and work a bit less, for instance.

I'm no professor in economics or anything and she's only one of them, so perhaps the current situation is perfect, but I do feel wealth distribution is a bit skewed today.