top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 103 points 8 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Are these people even watching the show? (probably deliberately disingenuous)

    Ake sits up and also wears shoes when things are serious. It a consistent visual cue. I'd be as mad as they were if cadets were dying and she were laying back in the chair just shrugging it off, but that's not at all what is happening. Part of her character is that she is serious only to the extent the situation requires, and I think that casual attitude makes sense for someone who has been around for hundred's of years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    Are these people even watching the show?

    Honestly? I have to assume not. I think they watch YouTube ""reviews"" of the show instead. At best, I'm sure some of them have it on in the background while they scroll rage bait on their phones.

    I think that casual attitude makes sense for someone who has been around for hundred’s of years.

    I think it makes sense too, but even if she was only in her 60s... who the hell cares? She gets the job done, she has the respect of her crew, again, who the hell cares? The fact that male characters (who aren't 800 years old mind you) are seldom criticized for doing the same thing should tell you all you need to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 77 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Online attacks against an actor on a Star Trek show is not very Star Trek philosophy. World needs more Spock’s and less Kahn’s.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I feel like calling Captain Ake "mumbles" is right up there with calling Picard "baldy". I get the feeling we're dealing with the kind of people who think one of those things is okay and the other isn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    It's pretty stupid to pick on Holly Hunter for her trademark.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 45 points 8 months ago

    The fact that this is happening is a disgrace to those who behave this way: you don’t embody IDIC.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (30 children)

    I haven't seen STA yet, but it seems like, with a few exceptions, the most recent Star Trek has always been controversial, since The Next Generation. I feel like Enterprise deserved it the most, and SNW escaped most of it. Discovery probably got it the worst? Though TNG was by far the least deserving of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (17 children)

    Which I find kinda surprising, since I would call SNW fairly "woke" if you actually pay attention to the show. Maybe it's just because it's a male captain set in the TOS era, and it's a more traditional trek show?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    SNW is a good balance. Discovery on the other hand, was way too emotional for me. Where is STSA on the crying-every-other-scene scale?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I found Discovery the same way, it's the only trek series I couldn't make it through.

    Picard suffered from bad writing unfortunately. Season 3 cashed in on nostalgia and I appreciate it for that, but the first 2 seasons were very meh.

    Starfleet academy is great though, IF you're ok with a show targeted to young adults. If you're not ok with that, the episodes will be very hit and miss. The most recent episode was fantastic, once you get through the 3 minute long sex scene it opened with. Even that does serve a purpose though to show the bond that's developed between two chars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    STA is another "SGU-like" i only see it will end quickly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    My main problem with DIS has a name: Michael Burnham. Not the actress, the script.

    And about your question: no, the crying is only in scenes that work (traumatic or sentimental enough) unlike DIS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Yeah, Burnham could have been better and she was the center too much. I like Discovery as a show, but I hate it as Star Trek because it actively goes out of its way eschew so many baseline Trek Tropes, the biggest and most obvious being the Spore Drive. It feels like the writers were like "We don't want to deal with the time issues of Warp travel.". Then they extended this to the personal transports, which at least made sense as it was the 32nd century.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    it was pretty much a push"woman can have masculine names too" kind of preachy attitude from Kurtzman, and not just ambigious name that be either gender. it still an awful name to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    STSA feels like a blend of Lower Decks and Discovery to me. I also had issues with Discovery (though it got better after the time jump) but have been enjoying Academy each week.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    IMO "woke" is a red herring when it comes to criticism of newer star trek. Some people hate things for this reason, but it obscues a more interesting discussion.

    The real dimensions of value are the writing, the vision, what each series considers "action", etc. I think it's a distinction between what you'd expect from a Star Trek movie and a Star Trek TV show. They're for different audiences, and I think Discovery, STA are going for a much wider market appeal (in varying degrees) and it changes the narrative structure, pacing, etc. I think they're exploring the audience space with variations on Star Trek themes to grow the francise, and sometimes it's to the detriment of what some people like about Star Trek - and sometimes it brings in new people.

    I like Star Trek to be ethics porn about IDIC being more powerful than raw power. About the value of an education, team work, structure, and trust. I like it when the most tense action scene is a walk down a hallway - but I also like a bit of space pew pew sometimes. The new shows alienate me when they focus too much on physical action, individual exceptionalism, and a grimdark future.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I dont like DIS because it does not feel very trek to me with the ugly klingons and the overall dark stories and characters. Also (like PIC) its very storyline so i cant really just jump into an episode and be happy (or unhappy, whatever story the episode is)            

    On the other side i think SNW is what should have been the first series after the pause after ENT. Its hopeful, most episodes can be watched alone and it still has a background story like VOY. And like every trek its woke.

    I think that PIC would have gotten a similar (smaller?) shitstorm compared to DIS if that was the first after the pause. LD maybe too but less for the quality and more because its animated. And PRO for feeling more nicelodeon than trek (or rather a mix)              

    If DIS came just later than others it would have probably been either more liked or at least ignored like a lot ignore PIC or Short Treks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago

    its also all the discontinuity of the series too. Klingon appearance, cloaking tech, ADVANCED TELEPORTATION tech that is never mentioned in any of the old series at all even if just referenced without showing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 8 months ago*

    snw is actually quite less "woke" than STD, std has all no-men crew by season 4, it was pretty obvious, and the lgbtq+ people have largely been marginalized by that time too, after they served a purpose in season 1.

    i think by SNW they realized how bad some of the characthers and how they are overly pushed as the leads.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Discovery definitely feels like it, especially since you have people still arguing quite animatedly about how it's not Star Trek, and might have Ruined Star Trek Forever, though I would rather imagine much of it to be recency and accessibility more so than much else.

    The other shows are a bit less accessible, even if they are newer, since CBS moved it onto their streaming service, and off of Netflix, whereas Discovery aired on Netflix around a time when Netflix was one of the bigger streaming platforms out there, and more people who aren't as into Star Trek or other CBS properties might encounter it incidentally.

    But for the most part, every single successor to Star Trek has always been controversial, and deemed to have ruined it forever, though most of it abates when the next show comes around, and is then deemed to have ruined Star Trek forever.

    Though TNG was by far the least deserving of it.

    I actually wonder about that. Most of the complaints, like the ones about Stewart being a shakespearean actor who wouldn't be able to handle the rigours of serious television, or being bald were nonsense, but there was a lot of good reasons to complain about early TNG. A fair chunk of the early episodes weren't very consistently good.

    We know it to be better in hindsight, but if The Next Generation had started today, and not only is the second episode a rehash of a Star Trek (1966) episode, but the fourth was Code of Honour? I would also be inclined to criticise it for being quite bad. There's a good reason why a lot of the advice for people watching TNG is to stick around until Season 3, or start from Season 3, since that's when it gets better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I think the series with the worst long lasting impact is Voyager. VOY Borg are really bad compared to TNG Borg. PRO uses TNG Borg, which is great, but LDS suffers for its VOY Borg and I heard PIC stinks because it makes VOY Borg the main villains.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    I don't know, TNG could be up there, but it was also generally influential as a whole, so both its good and bad ended up getting carried over.

    The entire exploding bridge trope came from it, as did evil admirals. It also set up the Enterprise as the flagship, with the best and brightest of Starfleet. Which also meant that people generally assumed it to be the norm when it was the exception, and that the hero ship was some special ship, when it was a normal ship of the line in TOS.

    VOY Borg are really bad compared to TNG Borg.

    They are, but more due to issues with overuse more so than anything. In TNG, we saw the Borg for all of 4 times. In Voyager, they were shown much more frequently.

    But as far as the timeline goes, it also wouldn't make sense to show an earlier iteration of the Borg, not when they were severely affected by the actions of the Borg.

    I heard PIC stinks because it makes VOY Borg the main villains

    I'd honestly argue that which version of the Borg to be a minor issue in Picard. Picard's bigger problem was that it didn't seem to know what it wanted to be, and kept leaping between multiple different plots and story lines, which confuses it a bit.

    It arguably have been better if it has taken one of those plots, and run with it for the entire show. Like the matter with Synths and former Borg drones being treated as subhuman, vindicating the concerns Guinan and Picard had in the Measure of a Man, or visiting the TNG crew and seeing where they are now. As it actually was, it seems like the writers/producers felt that now they had Patrick Stewart, they wanted to do everything before it was too late, and the result was a bit of a mishmash.

    The issue with the Borg tends to be more that they really aren't very much of a threat by the end of Voyager, and were dealt such a blow that it would be almost impossible to ignore.

    Their greatest threat, assimilation, is trivially curable, and it's now known that their assimilation abilities are one of their greater weaknesses. The Federation might have issues with infecting someone with a pathogen to make the Borg assimilate them and self-destruct, but others have no such qualms, and we know of at least one species that did use such methods (Icheb's parents).

    Their adaptation is a greater issue, but even older Federation ships, like the galaxy-class saw good effect just cycling their weapons frequencies. The Voyager's ablative armour would be well-studied after they returned to Starfleet, and dedicated anti-Borg weapons would have both been in active development, and also use.

    As of the events of First Contact, it's also known that not only are there Borg ruins on Earth that may still be intact and active, but that Borg ships are not as truly uniform as they seem, with Picard pointing out a weakness in a Borg cube that dealt catastrophic damage to it. Local signals, what he felt, scans of what remains of the area, and everything would have been thoroughly studied to determine how to both find and exploit those weaknesses on other Borg cubes, without a former privileged Borg unit at the helm.

    It would be difficult for them to retain much of the mystique and terror of their TNG appearance, with all of that now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    The bigger issue is the Borg queen. TNG Borg were the ultimate egalitarians. The ultimate communists. The federation's ideals brought to an extreme.

    VOY Borg are... a monarchy?

    The best thing they could do in future lore is reveal that the Borg queen is a fake, invented purely to manipulate the psychology of individuals.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Discovery probably "got it the worst" because it came out during peak gamergate-era politics. Online fandoms were weaponized and radicalized into right-wing culture warriors. Discovery is easily the least preachy of any Star Trek series but because it had a black woman in a leading role it became an obvious target for ragebaiters to make stuff up about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Ironically my biggest issue with Discovery is that it's pretty right-wing with its CIA stand-in apologia and blatantly militaristic style in Seasons 1 and 2 at least.

    That and the sheer degree of melodrama. Every episode needs to have scenes of at least one or two characters in total anguish. It just wears me down compared to other Treks. For a streaming-era show, it's not all that bingeable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I didn't like that they fridged Georgiou, who I felt was the strongest character they had thus far introduced. After that it became really really clear Burnham was the main character, which is a concept I don't think belongs in Star Trek. The only other series that gets close to having a main character is TOS, which I dislike for the same reason. Kirk and Burnham both become boring when they're the only point of view character for an entire episode.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Personally, of the new Star Trek that's come along since the Kelvin timeline was started the only thing I'm taking into my personal canon is Lower Decks. The rest has been completely meh at best, downright awful at worst. Most of it I've simply let pass out of mind and memory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    It's part of a general problem where old trek is basically competence porn (everyone is ridiculously competent at their jobs) while in new Trek everyone kinda acts like a teenager. Maybe it's a desperate attempt to appeal to a younger audience (I don't think that actually works tho), but it certainly doesn't appeal to fans of older Trek.

    It definitely breaks immersion to have characters that have serious jobs acting like teenagers.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    This is literally about people who don’t know how to do the job, being taught how to do the job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I thought the captain was the one that supposed to teach them how to do the job? Why is she acting like a teenager? How are they supposed to learn how to stop acting like teenagers and take their jobs seriously if the captain is acting this way too?

    Yeah it's just a show, but characters in a show should be acting as if the world they're in is real. It breaks immersion when they don't.

    There's a general fear of being genuine with characters in a lot of shows and movies, and it's gotten really old. It's really cringey at this point.

    It would be nice to have a show about people on a spaceship acting like people that are really on a spaceship that have serious jobs. It's boring to have yet another show where it's just people acting like youtube influencers on some spaceship sets. People that actually like vapid youtube influencers will only just watch clips from these shows, so what's the point of trying to appeal to that crowd?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Do you think she's acting like a teenager in a substantive way, or just in her style?

    I like her irreverent attitude and I don't consider that childish. She doesn't act impulsively, thoughtlessly, or disrespectfully. She takes her job seriously. She intentionally goes against the grain of traditional military stuffiness because she is decidedly not trying to train a military.

    The underlying military culture of classic Trek made sense at the time, but we can do better. I'm actually optimistic about SFA and that's almost entirely thanks to Hunter's portrayal of Ake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    It's not just military captains that are responsible for the lives of those onboard their ship. That's true for the captain of any ship. Even on a cruise ship. Read about the Costa Concordia. Captain didn't take the job seriously bent the rules and a bunch of people died. That captain sounded like he'd be a fun guy to go have a beer with at a bar or whatever, but he had no business being the captain of a ship.

    And this is my point. You want a show with a bunch of people that seem like they'd be fun to hang out with. I want a show about people that are actually good at their jobs. Sure they aren't really on a spaceship, so none of it really matters. But it's more interesting to me to see someone commanding a ship that's actually acting like someone commanding a ship. otherwise it's just actors on a spaceship set being quirky. The responsibilities of command the ethical dilemmas that come with that, that's interesting. A captain is someone the crew should respect, not someone they want to hang out with because she's like your quirky aunt.

    Besides that, isn't she supposed to be training these people? What happens when these cadets finish their training and get assigned to a captain that's not a quirky auntie type? In real life the drill sergeants that train people are the most hard ass people around so when people complete training they're ready for anything.

    And I'm pretty sure people in the federation aren't required to be in starfleet. It's something like a combo between NASA and the military both of which demand a high degree of discipline. Even in a utopian future there will be jobs that it's dangerous to have people that fuck around doing those jobs. Physics can be harsh and I think the vacuum of space will kill people even in a utopian future. Just that in a utopian future people will volunteer for those jobs knowing the risks and knowing they will need to be disciplined when doing the dangerous work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I agree with what you're saying; I just don't see it in Ake's behavior (perhaps because I am a few episodes behind).

    I haven't seen her behave irresponsibly or take the safety of her students lightly. Lounging and going barefoot are not safety issues, unless you consider all forms of unconventionality to be unprofessional, and all forms of unprofessionalism to be irresponsible.

    What I see in Ake is someone who takes her job seriously, and is conscientious about what deserves her care and attention -- and what doesn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Lounging and going barefoot are not safety issues, unless you consider all forms of unconventionality to be unprofessional, and all forms of unprofessionalism to be irresponsible.

    It's a morale issue, which a competent captain would be aware of. Crew members see that and think "if the captain doesn't give a shit, why should I?" Crew starts blowing off their duties which would ultimately result in a safety issue.

    There's a reason why people in positions of responsibility behave the way they do when in front of others. I'm sure Picard lounged around in his quarters reading books or whatever, but when called to the bridge he'd put on his game face and behave in a way that commands respect in front of the crew. It's part of the job of being captain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Now is about authenticity though. When I was young being an adult was all about being buttoned down and having no emotions, and definitely never openly being queer. If we genuinely believe that we’ve made any progress as a society by unmasking, then obviously a far future utopia should at least meet the low watermark we have set in learning to accept ourselves and each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Making a show about that would be genuine. Making a show about spaceship needs to portray a functioning spaceship. If it doesn't care about the functioning of the spaceship, it's just some actors on a set. Why bother with the spaceship set at all if everyone has to accept everything about everyone, even if it negatively impacts their ability to do their job?

    One of the most interesting episodes of TNG was when Jellico was temporarily assigned as Captain of the Enterprise. He had a real hard ass leadership style, Riker didn't like it and was confined to quarters, nobody liked him. Given it's Star Trek, you assume that it's going to turn out he was evil. But nope, he accomplished the mission Picard came back and resumed being captain. Leaving the audience with the question, was Jellico the asshole, or was Riker the asshole.

    There were a few episodes where Data was in command and he wasn't respected because he's an android.

    The thing about having a show about a future where everyone is accepting of one another and there is no interpersonal conflict is that is boring as hell. Considering the responsibilities of command, having interpersonal conflicts makes things interesting. Having a captain that acts like a teenager and everyone is cool with it, and the audience need to be cool with it because that's just how things are in the future is incredibly boring.

    And the show may take place in the future, but the audience lives in the present day. The ship needs to function in a way that someone grounded in how ships function in the present day, otherwise how are we supposed to know when the captain has crossed the line and when the captain is doing things that are normal for a captain to do?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    I like star trek starfleet academy for the most part. What I don't like about the show is that I can't watch it with my kids yet.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (35 children)

    I haven't watched STA. Is the captain really lounging in the chair and going barefoot?

  • source
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago (32 children)

    Yes, but in context it's not a big deal. A lot of it is contrasting her with her peer, the chancellor of the war college, who is uptight. Ultimately, she's less military commander, or even explorer, and more chancellor of a school full of students and in that capacity it makes more sense to generate a relaxed atmosphere. When the situation calls for it, she can be serious as well.

    She just has her own style, but people want to be negative because she's not Picard-ing hard enough or some dumb shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    On the contrary it is a big deal, it makes Ake extremely endearing and likeable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    She reminds me of a few of my professors in both my undergraduate English program and my graduate religious studies program, all of them wonderful and safe-feeling people. She's the first school chancellor we've really seen in Star Trek and she feels very much like a university-level educator to me--with the whole starship command piece being additional to her main job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    "It's a school but also they go on starship adventures" sounds so dumb to me I can't believe it works so supremely well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I was fully prepared to dislike this show (Disco was on shaky ground with me, but I was more or less on board, then they went to the 32nd Century; I was not a fan of that jump at the time and worried that SNW was going to be the only outlier in regards to Disco spin-offs that would be any good), and I felt affirmed in that feeling during the first few minutes of the first episode. But once the tone changed a bit I was happy to watch the second episode. Then we met Tamira and I just kind of fell in love with the show. Then they managed to take something sacred (the Sisko), pair it with my least favorite character (the SAM), and somehow making it a truly great episode AND making me come around on said character (thus proving that Tawny Newsome is an absolute treasure to this franchise--give me a LD/STSA crossover now!).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    I don't even know the premise for the show... If the captain of a flagship was lounging in the chair, I would lose lock pretty fast. Apparently this is an academy and she is more like a professor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    The Academy is a fully-functional starship, so she's both the captain and the chancellor. She's 500 years old, is a bit of a hippy, and is happy to lounge around when they're not facing a crisis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Jimmmy Kirk lounged around when there was a crisis so I don't know what these people are upset about

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Riker happily slapped his ass down in the weapons console so he could chat up the prettiest subordinate on duty. Not sure why we’re suddenly supposed to be pretending Trek ever maintained a stern and solemn work environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It's so odd how these criticisms are only directed at women...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    There you go, accusing people of being sexiest and racist just because they have a meltdown every time some piece of media prominently features a woman or person of colour. I’m sure it’s just a highly predictable coincidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago

    I encourage you to watch it and form your own opinion (just make sure to get past the first ten minutes of the pilot, the tone shifts dramatically).

    Captain Ake runs the Academy and commands the Academy ship, the Athena, which is used to do more hands on training but isn't the flagship by any stretch. She's more like a principal than a professor. The other main characters are cadets, with some strong supporting characters too.

    IMO it's the first live action Trek show in the new era to come out firing on all cylinders and it's great to see.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -9 points 8 months ago (17 children)

    Just remember, Star Trek ships don’t have seat belts. Gonna be fun when someone slams on the brakes and Captain slouchy goes flying out of her chair, across the freshly waxed floor, and into the viewscreen. At least the nextgen crew knew to put carpet on the floors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago* (12 children)

    These ships all had inertial dampers, otherwise the crew would be paste during most maneuvers. Seatbelts would just cause a different kind of mess. And even if they didn't, are you suggesting Picard's grip is sufficient to combat those forces? Because he didn't have a seat belt, either. Maybe it was the force of his presence that you think was going to keep him seated?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    And where are the seat belts?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Is that the sound of the warp drive in space? It certainly isn't the sound effect the explosions in space use.

    If it wasn't for artistic license, they could have gone with what happens when the inertial dampers fail in the spaceships in David Weber's books, which is a more realistic outcome (assuming realism is what you're looking for in a setting with warp drives and inertial dampers), but writing off the crews of ships that don't matter to the storyline in a red paste probably wouldn't go over well in a family drama. About as well as people sitting around in a pitched battle with the occasional hum or shudder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Just pointing out that the crew often goes flying around the bridge quite often in Star Trek, despite the “inertial dampeners” and I think someone sitting sideways in a chair probably wouldn’t fare too well in that situation. And that the slick mop-n-glo floors probably won’t help either. Thought used to go into the design of these ships, but now it’s all about “make it shiny and futuristic looking!” But honestly I think it would build some character into the show if it actually happened and Hunter’s captain had a good laugh about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    I like the captain. The show is alright; I think I'm too old to be the target audience but that's ok. Seems to be directed at teens.

    Every scene is so busy and glossy. The robots going around bear an uncanny resemblence to the Star Wars prequels ("it's so dense; every single frame has so many things going on"). The teen angst and romance doesn't exactly fit into what star trek means to me, but we did get a bit of that here and there in earlier series. Like in Discovery, IMO there's too much focus on exceptional individuals and less on teamwork. To me it seems like it's trying to be many things at once. Star Wars, Marvel, and Harry Potter mixed up in a Star Trek setting. I'm a bit sad we aren't pretending Discovery was a bad dream, but I can live with it.

    ... but, there is some star trek here, and I like those parts.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›