top 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 62 points 8 months ago* (9 children)

"My home is safe from climate change, Im not even close to the ocean!"

insurance company stops covering homes in your area at all due to increase in wildfire risk

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    I live in Chicago. What happens here is our insurance goes up to help supplement the increased coverage needed in places with increased disasters :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    A competing company can open an insurance scheme for Chicago homes only at the original price. The private sector has far fewer insensitives to subsidize weakness

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Yeah that's not how insurance works. Or rather, that will work until it doesn't. The reason insurance companies tend not to be local (except for places like Florida where the normal companies all pulled out) is because if an insurance company is local like that, eventually a large disaster happens against the relatively low odds and then there aren't enough other policy holders to diffuse the payout, so the company goes under. To stay afloat they generally need to pool risk both across types of risk and geographically.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    I used to use our states Farm Bureau Insurance for property and vehicle insurance. They were the most competitive provider around for a long time. Until about five years ago anyways. Now their premiums are a joke and they're trying to demutualize so they can merge with an out of state competitor because they're on the verge of financial collapse.

    Too many catastrophic wind storms over a short period of time.

    Edit: kind of ironic that an organization which spent years denying the existence of climate change and lobbying to prevent legislation to address climate change is now suffering the consequences of climate change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Man that's awful, sorry. What I find is kind of interesting is that they are, in a lot of conservative areas, the only conservatives acknowledging climate change through pricing, surrounded by other conservatives who refuse to acknowledge climate change in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 8 months ago

    Does it really matter either way? The Dow hit 50,000.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago

    See you down in Arizona Bay.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, about that.

    My province just had a very dry summer with very low water levels. Some wells dried up.

    At some point farmers were wondering how they would be watering their crops if it got any worse.

    Or what about flash flooding, either on flat ground, or in mountain towns? Or wild fires?

    There's certainly places safer than others, but a lot more people are going to be affected than just coastal inhabitants.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    another thing is the drier summers make flash flooding more likely as the soil hardens and then has less capability to absorb the rainfall when it's been completely dried out....

    Also the more chaotic weather means heavier rain in shorter bursts...

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 33 points 8 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I am in AZ and I am super curious what happens here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    got worse news for ya....

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    "Ha, Wet Bulb Temperatures won't threaten me because I live somewhere with no water!"

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago
    [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    "I'm not worried! I bet a lot of money on disaster striking!"

  • source