all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

Hmmm.. motives unclear. Could be either to give you more luscious, full lips, soothe your arthritic knees, or accellerate the growth of a malignant tumor.

(Edit) Wait, are you by chance a professional long distance ski jumper?

https://gizmodo.com/the-olympics-may-have-a-penis-problem-thanks-to-ski-jumping-2000718878

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    It is designed to increase a man's flaccid girth

    I don't understand the point then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I'm talking about the procedure described in the article. It's £3000 but all it does is make your soft dick girthier, which is pretty pointless? Surely you'd want it to be bigger when it's erect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Are you competing in the ski jump, by any chance? Also...

    "All these augmentation procedures are mainly to increase your flaccid girth, and it will have no benefit on your erect length - so functionally it's not going to improve matters.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I always understood it was width, not length, that was important.

    But at £3k a pop, I reckon one would be better off taking the missus on a decent holiday!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    You could try a fancy dinner for less. You might be too full/drunk after to be worrying about enhancing injections, which could be good or bad...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Is this a joke? Because if it is a joke you should definitely declare it's a joke at every mention, thus increasing its efficacy

  • source