I like that it isn't just a binary "yes/no". IMCO there's a big difference between using AI to generate a few assets/b-roll, and entirely automated video pipelines.
post
It struck me how seamlessly AI can now mimic human creativity, to the point where it's nearly impossible to distinguish between human-made and AI-generated content.
And let any non trained people to subjectively judge if the content is AI generated? With the latest versions of video generation models we are already in the situation where only software can tell if some videos are AI generated or not. Lots of channels will be wrongly tagged.
I think it's a pretty good idea. I personally don't have an issue seeing if it's AI slop as for me, they seem to be still very obvious with cuts not making sense, the generic male or female voice or even script errors. However, I can see it for channels that are using it more in a hidden manner like JCS' video "Newlyweds Tell on Each Other", which has since been deleted because of the backlash.
It's been hard to find good websites in top results of search engines. A lot of them are very well SEO tuned AI slop.
Especially on Duck Duck Go. Ugh. It's so bad sometimes. You search for a topic and the first page is all blog style websites with rambling, garbage A.I. text.
Mojeek and Ecosia are building their own index, and then you don't need to subscribe to a service that's all-in on AI
top 12 comments