all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 9 months ago

paying a premium for less is very apple-coded

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    I don't really mind. 90hz is my sweet spot. It feels smooth enough and I'm not unnecessarily taxing my hardware for comparatively little improvements.

    The only valid complaint I see is that 120hz is a little more versatile because it divisible by 24 and 30, while 90hz is only divisible by 30. So not as good for content that runs at 24fps. But even then, I still don't mind, I don't notice any presentation issues.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    unnecessarily taxing my hardware

    What?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    More frames = more GPU usage = more power usage = more noise (if you have a fan).

    I'm just saying that 90hz is a sweet spot for me. Sure, I can feel that higher refresh rates are smoother, but 90hz is simply enough for me.

  • source
  • parent