top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 9 months ago

"navigating a unique set of circumstances" When the agency is asked to investigate its own boss.

  • source
  • [–] 58 points 9 months ago

    Tulsi has left a paper trail showing how Trump, his entire admin, as well as the scrotus are compromised by Russia/Israel. They're trying to figure out how to bury that along with everything else they're trying to hide.

  • source
  • [–] 92 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Spoiler: she’s a russian plant.

    No shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 43 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Being locked in a safe only means Secret or above. However, the use of the phrase "grave damage to national security" indicates Top Secret. That's the sort of thing that's usually only accessed in a SCIF.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 9 months ago

    Putin’s puppet.

  • source
  • [–] 145 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    "grave damage to national security" is the definition of the Top Secret classification level, and it's probably in several SCI compartments too.

    This bitch is a Russian asset who has been exfiltrating national secrets to Putin for years (is the commonly accepted allegation).

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Which also means there is no reason Congress cannot be briefed. Congresspersons are routinely read into SCI and SAP compartments for basic oversight duty. They have their own SCIF and everything. If the regime is withholding access to oversight, it's only because Republicans on these committees are refusing to force the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago

    It's obvious to anyone who reads past the most surface reading of anything. This regime lies just like you and I breathe. Almost everything they say is a lie.

    One day, hopefully soon, he will be gone, and this whole thing will hopefully implode, but the damage is done. It's funny, because this whole regime has done "grave damage to national security" in many different senses.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Even with this, wasn't she the one who tagged along with the stealing of the 700 boxes of Georgia election results? Only the best.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 26 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Everything from calling her a Russian asset to voting abuse.

    So... is she gonna be the next president of the United States?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    A republican woman candidate at this point would be interesting. I imagine her having to occasionally pander to the tradwife stereotype, Katie Britt style, with a little bit of Mom's Old Fashioned Robot Oil and maybe some Martha Stewart mixed in. We got a little preview with Sarah Palin. I wonder what the think tanks learned from that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    When the fact that she is a Russian agent is common knowledge, you have to wonder what is so scary that it has to be locked up.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Who she compromised and their current positions in the administration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Again, the actual president is obviously compromised. Does it get worse than that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Possessing the Necronomicon Ex-Mortis and the knowledge of how to wield it?

    It’s hard to think of anything that would matter to anyone who could do something about it at this point.

    The US is such a failed state.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Are people unaware or have they forgotten that her dad, Chris Butler, is a cult leader?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Wikipedia says her dad is Mike Gabbard. Are you saying Mike Gabbard is actually Chris Butler, or that Mike Gabbard is a cuck?

    Either way this is the first time I've heard about this lmao. What a fucking joke we are as a country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Ah shiet, my memory keeps failing me. I watched a video about it a long while ago and just did a cursory search: "Tulsi cult", and went off memory alone. You're of course right. Thanks for the correction!

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It also implicates another federal agency

    Oooh boy who wants to take bets? Maybe how the FBI covered for her. Maybe she exfiltrated some information, NNSA or DOE would be funny but kinda boring. I'd imagine even just sharing capabilities could land this top secret to begin.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Get the whistleblower in front of an intelligence congressional committee and ask about it. The regime won't tell you shit if you're not GOP.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I'm all for shitting on any and all members of the Trump regime, but I'm not buying this one: if it's so classified, how come we get to hear about it?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    "Grave damage to national security," or, "Moderately embarrassing, but we will never co-operate because fuck Congress"?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago
    [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Wonder what has been alleged.

    Kleptocracy at its best.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Its just such a strange way to phrase this. All sorts of classified and confidential information gets locked in safes, usually because nobody is working on it, not because of how secret it is. It sounds like this piece of information is embarrassing to Trump in some way, which is generally not surprising and would explain why nobody is working on it. Claiming "grave damage to national security" is just a generic way to say they dont want to release it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It's not generic at all. It's literally the phrase used to describe the Top Secret classification. It's very precise wording.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments