all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 1 year ago

Christ, google must be salivating

  • source
  • [+] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    Do you mean to say what is wrong with US multinational tech companies forcing Australians to log into their services so they can extract more value from them under the cover of a voluntary industry code of conduct they wrote and submitted to their US born ex-employee that isn't mandated by any Australian legislation and isn't part of any Australian party policy to my knowledge?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Curiously enough, the only thing that went through the mind of the bowl of petunias as it fell was Oh no, not again.

    Oz gov yet again doing something unfathomably stupid with tech privacy, shocked I tell ya. Might have to point my SearxNG instance VPN endpoint somewhere else, maybe, see how it pans out...

  • source
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Interestingly apart from effectively mandating "safe search" on by default, this doesn't appear to attempt to restrict users who aren't logged in.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    @brisk I thought the same, though also I presume you’d have to be logged in to turn safe search off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't see anything in the document suggesting that, although there's also nothing stopping companies from doing that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Seems like a case of a Industry lobby group getting out ahead of the government to try to push an agenda to me.

    Logged in users are worth more than logged out users as far as digital profiling and advertising so let's conceal the juicy stuff behind a log in. Doing it this way makes the government the scapegoat. So I would guess 100% compliance isn't anything too concerning, they just want to juice their numbers to make line go up.

    If Google & Microsoft have to degrade our privacy and freedoms to raise their Oceania region profitability by 0.00000001% that's a price they are happy for us to pay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't see anything in the document as written that would stop users who aren't logged in from turning off safe search etc.. Of course it's in the company's interest to interpret it that way, but I would think an honest interpretation based on the current document would dramatically reduce the user value of being logged in to a search engine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Sorry I just see a "In compliance with government regulation to provide you with a full set of search results you need to be logged in" prompt in the near future. If they can drive people to log in, or even better/worse make people who haven't had an account create one, I see some big financial incentives for them to do so. Of course that is going to be offset by the potential cost of any breaches, but I can also see the silver lining on that of raising a bigger barrier to entry for any new competition that wants to get started in Australia, and a bit of supporting legislation that blocks "non-compliant" search engines from being accessed in Australia might actual serve to increase lock in. Maybe I am just being paranoid, but when I see an Industry aligned body co-authoring legislation I start to look for their angle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Do a lot of people log in to search engines?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    we're gonna fumble our way forward one way or another!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Just use Qwant. They won't even LET you log in.

    EDIT: I think Qwant may have some ties to the far-right. So maybe not Qwant. But I'm not gonna bother checking.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 2 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    WTF? This sounds incredibly dumb.

    It won't protect children from anything but it will annoy TF out of Australians and take away their privacy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 2 comments in c/austech@aussie.zone view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Aaand here it comes. Mandatory gov-verified ID required for any and all online activities.

    I've known since the 90's that it was inevitable. And of course not every country will immediately go for it, but eventually they will all follow suit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment