Well put, thanks for sharing. I submitted many of the same arguments as you, but not as eloquently or thoroughly :)
post
I would recommend calling it libre software/hardware/etc (whichever applicable) instead of open source, many people have a hard time distinguishing open source and source-available, eince they both essentially mean that the source code is freely available; conversely, libre (or liberated, although I have not seen usages of the latter) software/hardware/whatever mentions the more important aspect, which is freedom.
Open source is the language used by the initiators of the call for evidence. It is also clear from the language in their questions that they do not refer to source-available. In my response, I believe, I also make it pretty clear that I am not referring to source-available.
Although your GIF is indeed a great quip about the length of my post, it also illustrates a broader societal issue. Namely, the lack of time or willingness to engage with political topics that aren't formulated in short slogans. Both unfortunately for many people a product of the society we live in. I am a proponent of 4 day work week(or 6h/day), for this very reason. Unfortunately, some issues require more than a sentence or two to properly explain, argue or convey.
In my humble opinion, for some jobs, 5h/day would bring more benefits.
I agree with the sentiment, but a 4 day work week(or 6h/day) won't help at all, exactly because of this. Most people will just do more passive entertainment consumption in their newly increased freetime instead of informing themselves about some complex issues or learning something new.
And at least where I live, the people that are smart enough to do what you want them to, already make enough money to work however they like and have more than enough free tkme for this kind of stuff. (I personally know some who are well off financially and all they do is <20h per week or freelance 3-5 months per year)
It would help, especially for families, where parents hardly spend time with their children, which then wonder why they are so estranged with their offspring.
Also, making money requires having that money, in the first place, which is why many are in perpetual poverty.
hard disagree, it depends on where you live.
Which is at the current stage of globalism mostly a personal choise. I have friends that got here by hitchhiking on a container ship by asking the crew nicely and other who literally walked here for half a year, begging for food along the way.
I moved countries with nothing but my documents and a backpack full of clothes. And I am off way better now, by using my brain and not being an asshole.
And yeah, bit of survivorship bias, ngl. But it's far from the bleak picture you drew. If you live in a shithole, go somewhere else.

no comments (yet)