"test a new red line?" they did a fucking TV promo for their new concentration camp
post
They're coming for us all. If you're the wrong skin color. The wrong religion. The wrong political party. Even if you just get on the bad side of a local Republican boss. They're going to come for you.
Arm yourselves.
This isn’t a “red line” it’s the end goal. Don’t agree with whatever ghoul is leading the cult? You’re not a citizen and no more of those pesky “rights” apply to you.
Democrats waiting for the next election:

They have nothing to worry about; elected Dems will fall in line (since they can’t do anything), and the People who oppose will only protest in the time, place, and manner allowed by Republicans and attack anyone who points out that it will do absolutely nothing. It’s like me allowing my kids a hunger strike, but only after dinner. Check out my downvotes if you don’t believe me!
You're 100% correct only one solution but no one accepts it. They still think we can peacefully protest and vote our way out of this. I'm afraid we will get to the "then they came for me, and no one was there to stop them " faze. My theory by the end of the year Trump will start full on war against anyone who doesn't fall inline and kiss his feet.
And unfortunately they goimg get their way because large majority won't do anything but talk and do peaceful protest.
There is no low to which they will not stoop
I watched this video awhile ago about 3 Yale professors leaving the U.S. because of the rise in fascism.
From that video, Marci Shore, Historian of Totalitarianism:
There's an expression in Polish: "I found myself at the very bottom. And then I heard knocking from below." In Russian that gets abbreviated to "dna ne sushchestvuet" - "there is no bottom". What starts to matter, is not what is concealed, but what has been normalized. There's no limit to the depravity, and the sadism, and the cruelty that we are watching now play out in real time.
I wonder if that could be used on billionaires that threaten the "big, beautiful bill (tm)"?
We need an inverse lottery. The top 100 most wealthy Americans are automatically added to a pool and one is drawn at random each year. Then we confiscate everything they own, put them in the street, and see if they can get rich again.
My thought was; you get to keep anything up to a billion every year. Everything over that goes into a public fund, that fund gets named after who put the most in, they get their name on the bills that come out, those bills (same as green backs) get paid to community projects, workers, infrastructure maintenance, and the billionaires get to put their names on it
Conservatives are so evil, even Satan feels woke.
Satan IS woke! He wants you to have knowledge and think for yourself! He wants you to be a responsible adult and live your best life. All God wants is blind obedience, and to suffer in this life in order to spent eternity locking his feet in the afterlife.
I'm not religious but I feel like the whole thing about the apple and acquiring knowledge is pretty much the OG woke-ness.
It's not a "new red line". This is something that has already been tested in the courts because of a law written during WWII. It's only allowed in very narrow circumstances.
For instance:
If someone serves in a foreign military/government and they still have citizenship and it can be proven that it was voluntary.
The same law that allowed for that also attempted to allow for denaturalization in cases where someone:
- Deserted military service during wartime.
- Voted in a foreign election.
But these were both found to be unconstitutional.
Legal Eagle talked about those cases here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS-for7pUxU&t=980s
Oooo I called it! All I get is this shit sandwich.
You’re on that couch with us too.
I'm defending this couch from Vance.
You’re on that
couchtoilet with us too.
That's more like it.
A lone wolf looking for a pack is not a lone wolf, but a lost one.
To be clear, I'm only talking about wolves here.
Yes but your username makes this extra funny and you extra hypocritical.
I aim to amuse as well as inform 😉
You're deleted comments don't amuse nor inform, but they do make you look like a coward
How many do you think it would take?
5,000 (+- some) dedicated people who communicated well with each other and others. Who were willing to just stay in the streets until the government changed. The only one demand given: the president had to step down.
I’ve seen revolutions start with less, but America is large.
The President isn't the problem. He's certainly "a" problem, but let's not pretend that Vance is going to be any better.
Get rid of all the corrupt Republicans (redundant phrase), and you will still have MAGA, the silicon valley tech bros, a corrupt financial system, white/Christian nationalists, and the military industrial complex.
Then we have the Democrats who have proven themselves over and over again to be incapable of standing up against any of these groups.
Whatever we protest for, any result worth the effort has to address the systemic failures that led to the Trump presidency. Anything less is performative at best.
So, I’m just sort of typing without thinking about it much. But Trump will never step down, it’s an impossible demand, but it’s incendiary enough for orange face to not ignore it. This remains in the press cycle because it’s personal to him, there will be constant agitation by police and agencies against the protesters who just stay or regroup.
Assuming the original protesters stay the course, this will attract more and more participants because Trump himself, and the gop, will keep it in the news.
This is a positive growth cycle; eventually the demand will be the entire White House vacate when there enough protestors, and it’s now a revolution, peaceful it may be
The "Heritage" Foundation and all the tax-favored entities like it (incl. "religious" ones) will need to be dealt with.
the democratic party leadership are not just incapable, they are not on our side. They are servants of the rich.
My religious friends tell me that we have their thoughts and prayers.
Ogles and his supporters have looked for other ways to challenge Mamdani’s citizenship. In a Newsmax interview, Ogles suggested that Mamdani’s membership in the Democratic Socialists of America “would have disqualified him,” because DSA was “a communist organization.” If the effort failed, he said, it was still worth trying.
“Even if we can’t prove or dot the Is and cross the Ts and get this guy on this, it creates the template for these other individuals who’ve come to this country,” said Ogles to Newsmax. “They’re sleeper cells. They want to undermine our way of life.”
Tell us you have no idea what our way of life actually is, without telling us you have no idea what our way of life actually is.
I'm never sure what they mean by testing lines, these jerks can do whatever they want and the only thing that can stop them is violence at this point. And there's no winning against a military force like the US.
and the only thing that can stop them is violence at this point
There are a range of effective violent and non-violent resistance tactics. The important part is understanding that violent tactics will inevitably be necessary to complement the non-violent tactics. Violence alone doesn't work - look at the anarchists around the 1900s who assassinated a range of kings and police chiefs.
And there’s no winning against a military force like the US.
There are plenty of countries which have resisted US military invasion. They've faced atrocities and been left with horrific scars, but nonetheless this view of the mighty US military as unbeatable is repeatedly contradicted by its history. And a civil war would provide a different dynamic, so it's a bit of a mystery in my opinion. Obviously not advocating for that, and believe it or not the (whole) military is not an inevitable opponent.
all 12 comments