no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
13 comments in c/australia@aussie.zone view that post
[–] 42 points 10 months ago* (10 children)

Disband or gone underground? Nobody decided "hmmm, maybe it's wrong to be a bigot"

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I was thinking it would be harder for them to recruit if you take away their ability to advertise. I’d take bigots shutting up as a good first baby step.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I think this is correct - they will scuttle away to whatever holes they can find.

    I agree is that it's nice for them to be easily identifiable, but it does lend them credibility which is problematic. Like these guys were going to form a political party. I don't really want them to be legitimised in that way - as though their opinions might be unpopular but it's just one of many ideologies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    they will scuttle away to whatever holes they can find

    The March for Australia (26th Jan) is a nice sunny hole for them - we've seen that they have members as official marshals and event organisers. They'll probably try and sneak into One Nation, since they had trouble infiltrating the Young Nationals last time. And as The Age's expert suggested, they'll probably resume their "active club" formations, minus the uniforms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Yeah I think with the current legislation emerging they're really forced to make a big song and dance about disbanding. However, once the legislation is inked they will no doubt re-form in whatever way they need to avoid being criminalised.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    Legitimising them iss a choice. I'm keen on open ridicule and pelting with rotten vegetables (metaphorically if nothing else). Most would steer clear of them then and still allow them to be open about their views and the benefits that provides. We just seem to have lost the ability to openly deride bigots for fear of hurting their feelings, when they openly want to destroy the fabric of our open and multicultural society - they don't deserve that respect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    WDYM legitimising them is a choice?

    In the minds of idiots, of which we have many, forming a political party means they have serious well constructed ideas. You might like weetbix and vote labor, I might like fruit loops and vote NSN.

    It also gives them a platform. Journalists will consult them for comment because they drive engagement. Before you know it someone will have a regular spot on a Sky News panel.

    Legitimising them may technically be a choice, but I have no faith that we as a society would make the correct choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    Hence the vegetables...or maybe the return of Eggboy.

    But seriously, all those who just let them speak their mind or form a party, or invite them onto their shows or choosing to up engagement are making a choice to legitimatimise them. Giving them a platform to "provide a different opinion" is a choice. Not pushing back on their bigotry is a choice.

    Choosing to rip them to shreds is a different choice. Not allowing them to spread their bigotry is another choice. Keeping them visible but not engaging with them is a choice.

    They wouldn't have the build-up to form a party, or if they did, it would be a miserable little party that would die soon afterwards. It doesn't have to be difficult to fight fascists. It primarily takes pushback, ridicule and deplatforming. Not pushing them underground. People need to be exposed to their bigotry too so they realise the path they shouldn't take - it's literally a major reason we study political history or history in general. As humans, one of the reasons we've been successful as a species is pattern recognition - it's what we do. We see similarities between times and feelings and movements. Hopefully so we can learn from them. Oftentimes we don't and those who know their history can just sit back and shake their heads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    seriously, all those who just let them speak their mind or form a party, or invite them onto their shows or choosing to up engagement are making a choice to legitimatimise them. Giving them a platform to “provide a different opinion” is a choice

    Yes but as I said, society is not going to make the right choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Nothing will disband. Even in Germany after WW2, Nazis kept having meetings.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Wonderful news. I agree with (Ross?) in The Age that they're likely to regress to their "active club" stage.

    Reminder that this group's members and sympathisers made clear plans to counter protest Invasion Day marches. It wouldn't be wise to assume the dedicated neo-Nazis would suddenly abandon their efforts simply because their organisation is disbanding to avoid imprisonment - they have shown with the March for Australia rallies their willingness for deception, such as acting in plain clothes and as staff/marshals while others wear their uniform. So it's vital we show up on the 26th and make sure these scum stay gone for a while.

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] [S] 12 points 10 months ago

    Obviously they'll continue to operate in a less official manner, but still this should put a stop to their marches.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    Though I applaud the news, it's hardly world news as far as I'm concerned.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    World news is news from across the word, it is not news that impacts the whole world or else this community would be 99% US news.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I think American need should be treated the same way.

    But the news about fringe political parties isn't really world news (even if they were American).

    But yeah, it's uplifting, maybe I'm a bit harsh. I just feel like with their dissolution why do I need to know about them.

    But for the global fight against far right it's hopeful, so I'll reverse my downvote.

  • source
  • parent