I like this joke better:
Wife asks her husband if he is too obsessed with his work and if he even he loves her anymore. He assures her that in a list of things he loves the most, she is number 1 on that list. She was satisfied with the answer.
I like this joke better:
Wife asks her husband if he is too obsessed with his work and if he even he loves her anymore. He assures her that in a list of things he loves the most, she is number 1 on that list. She was satisfied with the answer.
He was not instructed to get back home. To this day he is stuck in the store.
people really overthinking the joke in the comments huh
I mean... do you know what community you're in right now?
I hate the fucking eagles, man.
I haven't seen this one. Enjoyed it.
There is a relevant xkcd for this, but I'll mark it as a lazy load.
Skill issue. Used an implied "of them", which is idiomatic in the language, but forgot to update the value of "them" first. Without that, taking the first value is compliant with the standard.
/s, but only if we assume us programmers have common sense. ^/s^
The joke is bad because the husband is supposed to bring seven gallons of milk. Since the egg condition is checked after he already got one.
No no, the imperative "get six" overrides the previous "buy a gallon of milk" if the "they have eggs" condition is met.
"get six" implies x === 6 not x = x + 6, that would be "get six more"
The real problem is that "buy" was only specified in the first case. Because the conditional was met, he should get six gallons of milk but not buy them.
Omg, youβre so right. I didnβt read it that way until you pointed that out.
Given the stereotypical difficulty of "product folks" and programmers agreeing on and building shared understanding of what to build, this joke seems clear and straightforward. It works because of course, the customer and the programmer failed to agree on something simple.
I'm pretty sure I've heard effectively the same core joke but better composed. Can't remember it though because at best it's middling funny.
Maybe it's just worse when written. The period at the end of the sentence makes it hard to see how it could be misunderstood.
To your point though, not sure if I'm aware of any programming language that would continue a statement with a following if block. Far more likely that it would fail due to lack of an element to apply the 6 to rather than having a pointer to the previous object, or he would try getting what ever the literal version of a 6 would be, or maybe some slang version.
Python, though the logic would be backwards:
milk_gallons = 6 if eggs > 0 else 1
Right, it would be started basically exactly the opposite. Certainly not a statement followed by an if block.
any language that allows ternary conditionals
I... like this joke and haven't heard it before!
Is this allowed or do I have to shit on it to be cool?
I dig this particular wit
all 35 comments