all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 10 months ago

At the risk of being trite:

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago

    You may head to Instagram instead, or give Threads an honest go, or start writing down your thoughts on smooth rocks then throwing them at various windows across your neighbourhood. It doesn’t matter.

    Recommending Instagram as an alternative to X is sort of like recommending Mussolini as an alternative to Hitler. It does matter. Of those ideas, the rock throwing will probably do the least damage.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    If you’re still on that shitty site and you aren’t someone who needs it for professional reasons, like journalists, I don’t want you in any of the spaces where I am. Stay there.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Remind me why journalists need X? I know it's an oft-cited reason for being on X but... surely it's possible to be a journalist without it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    Yet no one does… which is why there is a pedo president. No one actually cares

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 10 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Are you trying to say that Epstein's best friend isn't a pedophile?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    So, when a person fucks a child, is that a pedophile?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I leave review of the definition up to you. All I'm trying to do is agree that no one cares, and add that I think that it's because the label is not working to dissuade people from the Trump regime's policy because it has become overused and obtuse. I'm sorry for my lack of clarity, but it's pretty tiring to open the news every day to "so and so is a pedophile" while American citizens are being executed in the streets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    I mean, you still don’t answer. This is probably because you’re a MAGAT and you don’t think Trump fucking kids is a bad thing. So, I’m gonna tag you “MAGAT PEDO SIMP” and just be sure to remind you of who you are whenever I see your name. Which I’m sure won’t bother you at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

    I don’t feel the need to parrot the answer to a deliberately glib and disgusting question just to virtue signal to you that we’re on the same “team.” Label me however you wish, you have a right to your narrow, angry and incorrect opinion. But know this: you’re alienating potential allies and possibly contributing to abuse by diluting its definition.

    We want the same thing, we just disagree as to how it can be, or should be done. Not everyone you disagree with is a pedophile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    You’re not an ally. You’re a pedo simp. No one wants your kind—except maybe the republicans. Go back to where you belong, a MAGA rally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    And you are a closed minded fool too blinded by your impotent rage to even participate in a real conversation, or to see another point of view that may help even when it’s laid out in front of you. All you have are insults, because you’re all out of ideas other than to scream the word ”pedo” at everything and everyone you don’t like.

    It’s not working, you said it yourself: “no one cares.” Why do you think that is? Try something else. ICE is murdering citizens in the street. The US is about to invade a NATO ally. Trump just used the military to steal Venezuela’s oil for himself. The federal government is operating concentration camps. You’re focused on the wrong thing, and it’s by design.

    But hey, at least that sense of righteous indignation about how you “saved the children” will keep you warm and fuzzy while nuclear winter sets in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago

    A real conversation is where both parties agree to answer questions. You already ended the conversation when you—literally—said you wouldn’t participate. You can think you’re playing 3d chess, but you’re really just a tryhard incel pedo loser.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Nobody still on that site has any principles mate, sexual abuse content is not going to be anybody's "final straw". Very naive.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    X is a hive of scum and villainy

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Referring to fiction produced without sexual abuse as sexual abuse content is an abuse of language akin to referring to fictious depictions of murder as snuff film.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    That logic would make sense if we were talking about, say, someone writing or drawing or animating a fictitious depiction of rape or something. To my understanding though the controversy here is the AI being used to produce images of real people in a sexualized context, or transform images of them into that, which isnt quite the same thing as a depiction of a fictional character (or for that matter, a portrayal of a fictional act by consenting actors). The reason its getting called sexual abuse content isnt so much that the images are pictures of sexual abuse, but more the notion that the creation of the images is a form of sexual abuse, because the people depicted did not consent to be portrayed that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago*

    To be more precise, the reason it's getting called "sexual abuse" is that this has proven effective in affecting people's emotions and forestalling any annoyingly controversial philosophical nitpicking about whether or not creating images resembling some real person counts as abuse of that person even if they know nothing about it. Since this form of it is a new thing we don't have a better name for it yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • 25 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 35 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I feel like for the people still using X, AI-generated bikini photos of minors are pretty far from being the final straw.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Oh I thought it was Grok spreading lies that was the final straw, and before that the fascism, and before that it was the manipulative algorithms promoting racist views, and before that it was lack of oversight to keep content legal.
    But OK let's say it'¨s the illegal AI generated sexual abuse. Which by the way are clearly illegal in Denmark, not because of nudity, but because it is illegal to exploit the likeness of a real person.

    But by my count this is at least the fifth final straw.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure the author is well aware of this. It's a good piece because it comes across as honest and takes a look at the psychological causes why so many people are still active on X. An honest look at yourself is the first step to free yourself from denial, and it doesn't really matter how long it takes and how many bad things have to happen if they get it eventually and take action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    @RedstoneValley @Buffalox Marie Le Conte left X and joined Bluesky ages ago. She's mostly trying to make the point to some of her fellow journalists who are ridiculously clay-footed and don't seem to have realised that they haven't "made themselves a nice little corner of X", they're just swimming in fascist waters now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Yeah, you can't dictate what the final straw is to others. It's a personal matter to each individual. I for instance never accepted any amount of straws from twitter so to me everyone that ever used that site was crazy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    If you haven't left X by now you are a supporter of these things.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    There were so many final straws. So many lines crossed. Zero chance this is “the” final straw…

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    X is a right-wing brainwashing machine

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    If the Nazis weren't too much for someone I doubt anything is too much for them.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Good luck, so many people won't leave even still - "it's where all the people are, I need to reach people, yadda yadda".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    it pains me how many leftists are still on twitter after all this

    i get that bluesky is too liberal, mastodon too complicated and technical, and tumblr has too much pointless discourse, but… surely, mecha-hitler generating csam on command is worse?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    mastodon too complicated

    Literally the only thing to understand before using it is the multiple instances, which doesn't take a PhD. (Even better, you can safely use it even without knowing about instances.)

    If people don't want to move to Mastodon because it's "too complicated", they're not actually looking for an alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I suspect it's mostly about network effect.

    If enough people they cared to follow were only on Mastodon (or Bluesky or whatever), people would make the effort.

    Hell, Eternal September start loooooong before the Internet was easy. When people really wanted it enough, they made the effort - dial-up was maybe "too complicated", but once the promise of porn was there, they got online....

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    Instances aren't even the biggest pain point for new users (though it's certainly a big one as much as people insist that it's easy for anyone to grasp).

    The fact that by signing up to mastodon you don't even get access to all content (every instance has their own block list and federated content) is a massive sticking point. The decentralized nature of mastodon means that you can't have one uniform experience across the user base, and that's a huge hindrance to new adoption because people see social media as central squares where everyone is seeing the same thing, but that can't happen on mastodon by design.

    Also, and I'll die on this hill: the majority of people do not want chronological feeds that they curate themselves. They like recommendations and automatically curated home feeds with the hot new content tailored for them. Any product that only has chronological feeds is DoA when it comes to mass adoption.

    Oh, and don't even get me started on the fact you lose everything if your instance goes down (I've been through it twice, not fun). This is not actually the case with blue sky, funnily enough, since AT Proto was built specifically to detach your identity from the platform/instance you're on and carry all your content anywhere.

    Insisting that mastodon is easy to use for anyone is delusional. Mastodon, by virtue of being federated, requires you to be a much more conscious user than average. That's not necessarily a bad thing, and some people are happy about having this "normie filter". I also think that anyone can learn to use mastodon if properly taught, but regardless, it is a massive wall for adoption.

    It's not that people aren't seriously looking for an alternative (bluesky's increasing popularity proves this), it's that mastodon is too antithetical to what people want and expect from a modern social media platform. You can argue if it's good or bad that mastodon is not following the trends of popular social media, but whether you like it or not, not following said trends is what makes it massively unpopular.

    At the end of the day, people just want Twitter without the nazis.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago

    I used the opportunity to make my first post on Twitter in a year. Another guillotine picture, of course. Guillotines are the only appropriate thing to post there now.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/europeanfederalists@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    awww how unfortunate. She left X for Bluesky…

    It’s the same damn thing, lady. Same centralized bs …

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    Finally noticed it's a shit show?

    I was never on there, have blocked the domain at home and on my phone forever.

    Sounds like she was fine with all the other immoral shit going on, what a hypocrite.

  • source