196
Minnesota Democrat accuses Trump administration of a “cover-up” after Renee Good shooting (www.ms.now)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/politics@sh.itjust.works
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The same day, The New York Times reported: “The investigation into the killing of Renee Nicole Good, 37, federal officials said, would be the exclusive province of the F.B.I., which is overseen by a director, Kash Patel, who has described President Trump as an unerring boss, and even a king.”

If you’re thinking this has the makings of a cover-up, you’re thinking along the same lines as Democratic Sen. Tina Smith of Minnesota, who spoke rather plainly and unreservedly about her concerns during an appearance on ABC News’ “This Week.”

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 29 points 10 months ago (7 children)

The investigation into the killing of Renee Nicole Good, 37, federal officials said, would be the exclusive province of the F.B.I.

does the state of Minnesota really have to just hand the investigation off to the FBI?
Is there a Minnesota law saying they have to do that?
or is this one of those things where the democrats follow norms and traditions while the fascists look for any weird loophole and then just break the law if they don’t find one?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I see no reason they cannot have two investigations.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    They did start a second investigation. But the FBI literally stood in their way to prevent BCA from access to the scene. Once the FBI had collected the evidence, the BCA was further obstructed from accessing the collected evidence.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    When FBI holds evidence and refuses to let the state have access to it, that makes it real hard for the state to do anything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    They won't have access to physical evidence, but they've got plenty of video, and that's enough to make a conclusive case.

    When the Feds come down with a finding of no wrongdoing, Minnesota will have enough to charge him.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Ya think? Gosh, I don't know.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Dems love to talk

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Minnesota "Dems" are not DNC. They are largely indistinguishable, but the party in the state is Democrat-Farmer-Laborer, and it has always been far more progressive.

    It's no coincidence that our state is targeted by Trump. We have pissed off the regime in every small way that bothers him. And we will continue to do so.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [+] -21 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    "Drive baby drive"

    Fuck around and find out, no sympathy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •