What's crazy is that they aren't just doing this because they make more money with AI. They're doing this because these AI companies have basically pre-ordered a fuck ton of components that have not been manufactured yet to be put into computers that haven't even been made yet for datacenters that are not even built yet all on an electrical grid that hasn't caught up. As long as the manufacturers get paid they don't really give a shit, but this is so unsustainable it would be hilarious if it weren't so catastrophic for the rest of us. And as long as the line goes up as they all circle jerk their money around they'll all be happy and can pretend the economy is good.
post
GEEEEEE, what a coincidence, eh? Almost like these companies may be coordinating some sort of market shift for some reason.
What do you call that when a bunch of companies responsible for large swathes of market share of a particular good or service use the guise of unnatural market pressure to create conditions unnaturally beneficial to themselves and not consumers?
This sounds like they are joining the war on general-purpose computing, and not on our side. Fuck em.
that doesn't seem to be the same thing, I skimmed most of the article, but that speech is about restricting what hardware can do , not making hardware unavailable to general people so that we become dependent on "cloud computing"
The reason I see the connection is that big dogs like Apple or Microsoft will be able to get RAM from those suppliers (or build it themselves like Samsung), and will be able to sell you walled-garden "computer appliances" which only run approved software. But you won't be able to afford to build your own computer from parts yourself, and won't be able to install whatever you want on it as a result.
Think about the power Microsoft has when they have every business document on earth and an AI that can summarize vast quantities of them on an ongoing basis.
They’re taking control of free markets, of political movements.
The speech is about software (and laws) not being able to properly limit software, and that as long as we have "General-Purpose Computing" (aka. PCs or hardware/computers that you have access to) we will not be able to properly limit software. Cory just didn't think as far as the solution 15 years later being to move the hardware on which your software runs away from you.
It is quite tragicomic how we went from mainframes and terminals in the 60's to GPC/PCs in the 90's and now are moving back to cloud (aka. mainframes and terminals but on a global scale).
Freedom in the future will require us to have the capacity to monitor our devices and set meaningful policy on them, to examine and terminate the processes that run on them, to maintain them as honest servants to our will, and not as traitors and spies working for criminals, thugs, and control freaks. And we haven't lost yet, but we have to win the copyright wars to keep the Internet and the PC free and open. Because these are the materiel in the wars that are to come, we won't be able to fight on without them. And I know this sounds like a counsel of despair, but as I said, these are early days. We have been fighting the mini-boss, and that means that great challenges are yet to come.
(emphasis mine)
I think Cory was pretty clear that it wasn't just about copyright and DRM, and the enemy will come up with new ways to achieve its goals. That article was about the first battles in the war, we're now entering the midgame.
If we can’t store or compute anything, we will be reliant on those with that power. Cloud providers. They will suck up all our data, analyze it with their AI, and charge us for the privilege.
They are forcing us to rent from them their ability to watch us and predict us.
Welcome to the global panopticon.
SK Hynix (and Samsung) is worse than Micron.
Micron scrapped Crucial, the consumer brand they owned.
SK Hynix and Samsung never even directly sold to consumers to begin with.
SK Hynix and Samsung were the ones who signed deals with OpenAI on the same day for 40% of the entire fucking planet's DRAM supply that kicked off the DRAM panic buying to begin with! This mess is their fault!
Micron are absolutely shifting to more profitable HBM production in order to make the most of the AI bubble, and they're fucking us over in doing so, but IMO what they're doing pales in comparison to the levels of fuckery that SK/Samsung have done with the shady backroom OpenAI deals. I repeat... 40% of Earth's RAM production.
It really angers me that those two have so far escaped media wrath while Micron was exclusively taking the hit for an entire shady industry. Blame all of these fuckers. Blame OpenAI. Blame Nvidia.
Both companies sold directly to consumers. They just sell cheap jdec garbage ram, so people normally don't buy them. Both companies do make a lot of storage devices and do sell directly to consumers.
Micron had sold their profitable product rights to lexar , and then split lexar back into its own company. If micron didn't launch micron pro by crucial right before departing the business, it would have made sense for them to stop the consumer market since they were selling commodity jdec ram and cannot tell more profitable gaming targeted overclocked ram due to their deal is splitting off lexar. They killed crucial right when they could start selling the good stuff again.
So I FOMO bought an SSD and SD card when all this started.
Not regretting it.
…But now I’m considering hoarding a spare GPU. Is that nuts? I don’t need it, I don’t want to hoard, but If my old Ampere card suddenly dies, is it gonna take $2000 to replace?
I mean, look what happened with the crypto boom and that wasn't overly mainstream companies. So not nuts imo. But maybe get a less expensive GPU to hedge your bets 🤷♂️
Oh, I know. I bought my previous GPUs in the peak of cypto busts.
But I need 24GB... My plan was to eventually buy a used 4090 when they get cheaper, or 24GB Intel/AMD card. But it doesn't feel like AMD/Intel are interested in big GPUs anymore, and the 4090 just keeps going up in price.
The RX 7900xtx is 24gb and sells right now for around $900.
This is an option.
The problem is, while faster on paper, its not really any faster than my 3090, especially in spots where I need its performance most. It'd be a downgrade.
I could get a second 3090, I guess, and have some redundancy in case one fails. But I'm on an ITX board with 1 slot.
I'd be WAY more interested in a roughly equivalent 9000 series or Battlemage card, but alas, there is none.
top 30 comments