also adjusts for changes to enrollment ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago (7 children)
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago (6 children)

    Its a way to make more libertarians. Cutting school spending only has 1 outcome

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)

    Not increasing funding is not a cut. In fact, the schools will still get more money every year. ๐Ÿ™‚

    In the period from 2001-2024, per pupil spending in New Hampshire has doubled on an inflation-adjusted basis, but test scores have remained the same... https://jbartlett.org/2025/06/per-pupil-spending-in-nh-nearly-doubles-from-2001-2024-as-district-public-schools-spend-1-25-billion-more-on-54000-fewer-students/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    Not increasing funding, when things are more expensive is cut

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    Okay bear with me here. So school budgets will still go up by the rate of inflation. Inflation is how much more expensive things have become, so in inflation-adjusted dollars, they will be getting the same amount of money. Does that make sense?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, ok bear with me. You know inflation is always 100% accurate to reflect real costs right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments