This magazine is no longer legitimate.

all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 84 points 10 months ago (16 children)

FWIW, I think they pick the most influential person or persons, not the person I think is the best from the year. Hitler was person of the year and so was Trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    Exactly this. "AI" and the people behind it were highly newsworthy, it's not a prize and never has been.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    AI isn't people.

    Imagine if they said that subprime credit swaps were the person of the year in 2006.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Despite the name, the title is not just granted to individuals. Pairs of people such as married couples and political opponents, classes of people, and inanimate objects have all been selected for the special year-end issue.

    — Wikipedia

    Notable past winners include:

    • The computer
    • The endangered Earth
    • The Spirit of Ukraine
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Useful information. That said, it's probably a little more dangerous in this case because too many people are personifying LLM behavior. I don't think any people assume The Spirit of Ukraine is a sentient being, for instance.

    But I concede that the people pushing AI certainly can be, especially since their influence has ruined so many lives already and is poised to ruin many more, both directly and indirectly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    The front page literally says: "the architects of AI" are the person of the year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    In tiny font compared to everything else. It's clear AI is the person of the year.

    Although "the architects of subprime mortgages" would have been a funny person of the year too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    It's the only text on the front page barring the artwork

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    The "artwork" is literally giant text that spells AI. "The architects of" is a thin font off in the corner. AI is the main event.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    And the art shows people building the AI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago

    And they're also small and insignificant while AI is the big, bold thing in the center. It's what people are going to see.

    If you ask the average person who looks at this cover "who is the person of the year" they're going to say "AI". It's intentional.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    In defense of Time magazine here they did have Hitler as person of the year once. Its just the most influential person/thing not the "best".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    That magazine was already irrelevant since a decade ago, I've never taken their person of the year thing serious

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    AI is definitelly the "Thing of the Year" in terms of its impact.

    Doesn't mean it's a good thing though, just high impact (and impact which is going to be even higher when the bubble collapses dragging the rest of the American Economy with it).

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    ITT: people taking a fake award both at face value and way too seriously.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    It's Time ended long ago.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    wonder if mortgage lenders were person of the year in 2007

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Hell of a way to announce you don’t understand the concept of Time Person of the Year

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Yeah, that's the excuse they use when later it turns out that their picks weren't that good, but overall theme is that they try to show the positive people/events.

    AI is being prepared as a revolution that can have positive benefits, they are also trying to mislead people that it can think, though when you actually use it for things like software engineering you quickly learn that it is now scam than anything.

    The tool is only good in negative aspects such as disinformation and surveillance.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Cover looks like slop.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Its not a good person contest. It's people who have been prominent.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    it. never. was.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Is this real? This can't be real. Is it?...

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    OP tell us who you would put up there instead and why

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Everyone here is complaining that AI isn't a person and bringing up 2006... Nobody seems to remember 1982's person of the year.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I stopped considering it legitimate when they claimed that I was person of the year in 2006. I didn't even do anything besides post on myspace, leave youtube comments, drank vodka, and slept around.

    What? It was my early 20s.....if you don't wake up five different times, in five different womens beds, where you have no clue who they are, where you are, or where your kidneys are....then you're not doing your early 20s right!

    Now.....early 40s? I drink a lot of water. Did you know you should be drinking more water? Because you should be drinking more water.

  • source