The plane carrying Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Florida for talks with U.S. President Donald Trump passed through the airspace of three countries that are parties to the International Criminal Court, despite an active ICC arrest warrant against the Israeli leader.

Flight tracking data from FlightRadar24 showed Netanyahu’s aircraft, known as “Wings of Zion,” crossed the airspace of Greece, Italy and France before reaching the Atlantic Ocean.

All three countries are signatories to the Rome Statute, which obliges member states to cooperate with ICC arrest warrants.

all 58 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 10 months ago (4 children)

So now the question is, what accountability and consequences are we going to apply to the Greek, Italian, and French officials who failed to do their goddamn jobs and aided and abetted a war criminal?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago

    So continues the collapse of the modern-day League of Nations

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 10 months ago

    For the love of Atlas, stop letting dictators get away with everything

  • source
  • [–] 54 points 10 months ago

    The champions of human rights and international law \s

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago

    It would have been awesome if someone shot his ass out of the sky

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 10 months ago

    So all three countries failed to kill 2025 Hitler when they had the chance

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago

    Fascinating to see all the colonial and post colonial grandstanding of the West culminate into this.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    I mean I figured it was all a bunch of fucking posturing, but it's nice to have confirmation I guess?

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    No one is going to arrest him while he’s still PM

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago

    There are a lot of countries that absolutely would arrest him. Unfortunately close to none of them are the ones touting international human rights.

    Here are a couple of his past flight paths:

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    This is a sad reality. I don't understand why you're getting down-voted for a realistic take. We live in a post-conscience world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    We live in a post-conscience world

    I disagree. The only thing that changed is that (some) people stop pretending that exists some kind international law, and any and all treaties signed by all countries are subject to political and/or economical pressures. Enforcement of said treaties work the same way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Huh, I am curious to see how diplomatic/absolute immunity (just using the local jargon not colloquial terms) and that treaty mesh

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Not. Which is why Netanyahu avoided several countries like Spain, which would have provided him a more direct flight to the US.

    The countries listed were Netanyahu's detour route where Israel exerts enough control to surpass their legal system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (22 children)

    What would the countries be supposed to do? Let's ignore politics. I'm a small law-abiding country, I'm a member of the ICC. Let's also assume that I'm aware of the warrant and have knowledge about the flight path and the passengers.

    Now what? Shall I politely ask them to land in The Hague? Should I use force? Risk starting a war?

    The only realistic option I see is to diplomatically request to use a different route. Or maybe make it so that I can pretend I was not informed.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Yes, you have air traffic control command them to land. If they don't, you escort them down with jet fighters. All that has occurred here is the ICC has shown that warrants can be situationally worthless.

    Yes, you risk starting a war if you arrest a war criminal. That sucks. But that doesn't mean you ignore the warrant for fear of consequence. Now our fucking idiot president here gets a huge, very unneeded ego injection knowing European powers are afraid to arrest criminals going to speak to a convicted felon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Should I use force?

    Yes. You scrample fighter jets and force them down, using missiles if necessary.

    Risk starting a war?

    This does not follow. The war would be started by whoever illegally retaliated for a lawful arrest, not by whoever did the arresting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    The semantics of who "is to blame" for the war are ultimately irrelevant to the small nation trying to avoid being in a war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 10 months ago

    Yes landing the plane with force is literally the law.

    Or even easier, don't give it flight space access. Flight space access is granted on request. Planes don't just simply show up above an airspace and hope to not get shot down. It's all with permission.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Netanyahu did not show up at the border unannounced saying "let me through or else". He got permission ahead of time. Had he not gotten permission, he would have had to find another country who did or gone around. Especially for Greece and Italy which don't really stand in his way, the Mediterranean is right there!

    Even assuming that Netanyahu calls the bluff and flies through, there are a lot of options ahead of all-out war. For instance sending jets to "intercept" his plane and escort him out saying "he refused to follow orders to land and we did not deem it worth it to escalate the situation". It's not like his airliner is armed or anything. But it would send a very different diplomatic message.

    For France in particular, this is far from the first time he flies over its territory unimpeded. This is not a matter of military concerns, this is pro-Israel Macron taking a stance to show support for his ally. He's not been very outspoken on Gaza because the domestic political situation is very delicate and anything he says can only weaken his support further, but his personal stance is hardly a secret and the military interceptors are under his full control.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    Yes you can tell them you will arrest them if they fly over. And you should start a war.

    Not sure what the point of joining the ICU if you don't want to hold the laws.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Start a war? Part of the point of joining international organizations is to stop war from reoccurring so for you to casually suggest starting a war is to come from a completely unserious position.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Until the leaders of countries, and all those seeking that same power fear to misuse that power, war will be a natural state of our species.

    Sure, you might have to start a small war or two, but eventually people will get the point that their leaders need to be held accountable by the people of those countries, or other countries will hold them to account.

    Without any of that, we end up exactly right where we are, where leaders and countries can get away with genocide, completely invalidating any power those global institutions are supposed to wield.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (8 children)

    How do you arrest one person on a plane flying through the air?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    You intercept with fighter jets and give them one last chance to land. That's not my opinion, that's literally how it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    And if they don't...? It's a nice idea, but do you think they're going to shoot down a plane with other people on it and everything will just be fine?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I don't think anyone being above the law is just fine either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    My point was I don't think there would be any real consequences if they didn't land and obviously shooting them down would cause a lot more problems. For the record, I dont think either are ok, I just think that's the reality of the situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I blame Trump for putting them in an impossible situation

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Implying any American president wouldn't do the same? (cough like Biden admin)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Read a damn history book… all these countries were on the HITLER side of the war during WWII!

    Smart people NEVER FORGET! They are all COWARDS and will always be!! Read… history!

    They are selfish and in it for themselves! They don’t give a damn about the world… hence, history repeating itself again!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Did you know the Greeks have a holiday commemorating the day they told fascist Italy to go fuck off?

    NEVER FROGET!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • 33 comments in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml view that post
    14 comments in c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world view that post
    5 comments in c/world view that post
    1 comment in c/actually_infuriating@lemmy.world view that post