top 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 98 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Alien has 4 fingers...nice touch

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    all your base are belong to us

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    There are only 10 types of people:

    the ones that expected a binary joke, and

    the ones that expected a ternary joke, and

    the ones that expected a quartenary joke, and

    ...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    And it works just as well, if we reverse the roles:

    🪨🪨🪨🪨🪨
    🪨🪨🪨🪨🪨
    🪨

    Human: There are 11 rocks.

    Alien: Oh, you must be using base A. See, I use base 10.

    Human: No, I use base 10. What is base A?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago
    [–] 24 points 10 months ago

    This post made me decide to go to sleep because I'm too fucking tired for this shit

    Thanks

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago

    1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 22, 23, 30…

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    So should I be saying base 9+1?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    for that one alien, you may say :
    "base 3 + 3 + 3 + 1"
    For universal other sentient beings, say :
    "base 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
    + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    "I'm 16, but in base 1, I'm 10000000000000000 years old. My ID just needs to be updated."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Since in base 2 you have two numerals that are (0, 1) ...

    Then, in base 1 you would have only one numeral.
    if it was (1) then you could write :
    ( , 1, 11, 111, ...)
    With a sign (-) for negative numbers :
    ( ..., -111, -11, -1, , 1, 11, 111, ... )

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago

    Oh, sorry we're base 22

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Oh fuck oh shit I'm too high to handle this RN!

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    A base-neutral system for naming numbering systems (by jan Miseli) is my favorite solution for this problem.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago*

    "You must mean Base 22"

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Is this from the Hail Mary trailer?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Base 1 is the only universal counting system.

    They are using base 1111 and base 1111111111. Instead of digits, you can represent numbers using rocks, if needed.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Base 4 but indexes start at 1

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    My species uses e as its base because that is proven to be mathematically optimal. In our number system, humans use base 2.3025850... (but written entirely as powers of e using our far superior elegant notation, of course!)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    The only true base is binary. I'm not even kidding, I still sometimes convert numbers to binary for the sake of simplifying operations if I'm tired. Have you ever tried calculating square roots in binary? It's shockingly easy compared to decimal.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Only works in written form. Unless the alien says the number as one-zero.

    Also, in a bijective number system, every base is 11. (they don't have 0)

    edit: not true, brainfart

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments