top 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 143 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Actually there’s dozens of really good free / open source apps that can do that. Let’s face it, forgetting to flatten the edited version is not a technical problem. It’s a laziness one.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 107 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    One of the few communities I miss on reddit...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • Yeah I'm not sure, but haven't spent any time really looking through them. I've seen some images that were clearly scanned and the size reduced so you couldnt read words in the image you'd think they would have scanned the redacted files as well to the same PDF dump or whatever, which had they done would have flattened them. To me it seems more of a we "properly" redacted and covered up files for some people, and we didn't care as much about others. Whether or not they were trying to allow for those people to be "accidentally" found is a possibility, but who knows

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    A lot of open source applications can't be used by government agencies because the pedigree of the software can't be verified, so you can't be sure foreign entities didn't add any code.

    But really there's a million ways to do this - even whatever application they used would have been fine if they simply printed out the redacted files and rescanned them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I really don't think these things are as connected as you want them to be.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah it’s far more likely they were just incompetent. If I needed to redact a document I sure as hell wouldn’t be using acrobat to do it.

    And frankly as much as I hate Elon and think DOGE was a farce, I’m not going to lament Adobe getting less government money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    DOGE only existed to benefit Elon and his companies while also allowing for cover ups of any crimes he committed or his companies did by ending active outgoing investigations that were happening via gov’t agencies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    His face is so annoying to look at

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    Fake news. Adobe would never tell you if you're paying for an "idle" account.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago*

    What's insanely stupid about all of this is there's no way that doge knew that those accounts were inactive. Their definition of inactive will have been, it hasn't been used in 31 days. Since that's an easy metric to pull up.

    But so what? There are licenced applications that I use at work that are only used once every two to three months. There js stuff that I only need in January, February and March because it's related to mitigating problems caused by poor weather conditions, outside of those months the weather is usually pretty mild.

    So I guarantee that they caused a wave of IT support tickets a couple of weeks later from people that now needed to use the applications and had found that they had been there removed, without anyone talking to the relevant parties.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    Does anyone know if there's any open-source Linux software that does redactions just like Acrobat?

    Edit: Thanks a lot for your suggestions! Will check them out later 🙂

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    https://github.com/digidigital/CoverUP

    https://coverup.digidigital.de/

    German made - cross-platform, and renders the new PDFs as images, not text, to make sure that you can't read the redacted bits afterwards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Yeah, it’s called a print driver. You print the docs, redact to hell, and rescan them. That’s what they did during Trump 1. But there were actual competent people then. Now, only dumbass sycophants.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Not open source, but I use the free demo version of PDF-xchange for the most common editing tools. Highlight and draw boxes and comment etc.

    It doesn't actually matter what you use to edit it. The key to locking it down is simply to print to pdf as image instead of saving as pdf. I use the "Microsoft print to pdf printer" to do this. It's in the printing dialogue.

    The document is now a fixed picture. This will obviously also ruin the search feature.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Why are govts using Adobe or anything made by the private sector is beyond me.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Jesus. I've administrated a bunch of Adobe accounts in various ways and it's not always straight forward to tell what licenses are in use and by whom. These pencil necked fucktards thought they somehow knew better than the government IT guys, what's in use and what isn't....

    Incredible.

    In any case, I'm glad their eating their own chow. They made this bed and now hopefully, they're about to get fucked in it.

    I somehow doubt it, but I can dream Harold.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    First thing to be thankful of proprietary software for?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Pedophiles can't redact pdf files?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Tbf, I feel like this ain't why the government failed at redactions, but the the thought of it being true is very amusing.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Your skyview.social link returns “invalid url” for me.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I thought Leon was good at computer....

  • source