• Chinese media platform NetEase ran a Dec. 14 article urging Beijing to “prepare for the worst” if Russia fractures, arguing the Russian Far East’s 7 million square kilometers should not be “lost.”

  • The piece frames the region as a resource treasure for China and a burden for Moscow, then outlines an annexation by stealth” playbook: deepen investment, move people and money in, lock long contracts, promote pro-China local elites, introduce the yuan, and finance infrastructure with loans that create dependence.

  • It also cites “unequal treaties” from 1858–1860 to revive territorial claims as Russian security officials quietly warn Beijing is encroaching.

Archived

[...]

For more than 25 years, the great fear of many Russian national security strategists has been the increasing vulnerability Moscow faces vis-à-vis the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nowhere is that anxiety more pronounced than in the Russian Far East and Pacific coast regions.

[...]

That region is home to a number of strategic industries, including the massive Komsomolsk-na-Amure aviation production plant that manufactures the most advanced Sukhoi fighter aircraft, most notably the Su-35 and Su-57.

The PRC has already purchased the first of those two models. The second is loaded with technologies and on-board systems that Beijing would like to have.

Therefore, Moscow’s “China nightmare” has been, for years, that as Russia’s population in the East continues to decline and its economic prowess declines, the combined weakness could prompt the PRC to begin seizing some of the most valuable areas of that territory. According to a classified document leaked from the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) earlier this year, even Russian President Vladimir Putin fears that Beijing is already “trying to encroach” on this territory.

[...]

[Russia's] nightmare is now coming close to becoming a reality—a very bad daydream.

On December 14, NetEase, one of China’s largest media platforms and officially listed with hundreds of millions of users, published an article with a headline that telegraphed intentions Russia has long feared. “China Must Prepare for the Worst: If Russia Collapses, This 7 Million Square Kilometer Territory Must Not Be Lost” is the title of the Chinese-language article.

The subject, of course, is Russia’s Far East. The irony is that the PRC is the very nation that Putin so defiantly “pivoted” to in the wake of Western sanctions after his invasion of Ukraine.

[...]

And it is that same nation he was counting on to evade Western sanctions that is now talking openly about beginning to devour one of the most strategically important regions that he rules over.

The Chinese authors do not even attempt to clothe Beijing’s ambitions in any diplomatic or circuitous language. The Far East is like a “chicken rib” for Russia, they write, an enormous but useless region, because “there’s no money for development, no people, and the war in the west is draining the last resources.”

For China, however, it’s a “treasure”—teeming with gold, diamonds, oil, gas, and timber. In other words, everything Beijing desperately needs.

[...]

The Chinese language article reads:

“One should not attempt to seize it by force; this would lead to global encirclement, as happened with Crimea. The smart approach is to be more accommodating, continue investing money and human resources, sign long-term contracts, and support pro-Chinese forces in the region. Nominally independent, but practically dependent on Chinese support."

As a Russian commentator points out, this plan is not some conspiracy theory or wild speculation. It’s a direct quote from Chinese media. One step after another is spelled out: create economic dependence, introduce the Chinese currency (the yuan) as a local legal tender; build infrastructure, bind the locals to Beijing with loans (that are used to pay for the infrastructure), and wait for the “political landscape to change.”

[...]

The Chinese could also give the Russians lessons on historical grievances and how to play the victimization card. Like Putin in a Tucker Carlson interview, the article reaches back more than a century and a half to remind readers that, in 1858, Russia used the Treaty of Aigun to annex 600,000 square kilometers north of the Amur from a weakened and corrupt Qing Empire.

[...]

For China, these territories being part of Russia are the consequence of “unequal treaties”, the term that Beijing officially uses to describe these 19th-century agreements. In China’s eyes, the agreements are not binding, Russia still “owes” this territory back to the PRC, and the debt remains unpaid.

Chinese intent is clear. When Russia collapses from the strains caused by the Ukraine war, this issue will be dealt with.

[...]

Russia is bogged down in this war, write the authors, and now its GDP is “smaller than a single Chinese province,” and thanks to that war [in Ukraine], Russia now has fewer than “50,000 troops remaining in the Far East—essentially an empty shell”, as Chinese media openly writes.

[...]

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
23 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Every country has contingency plans for all kinds of things.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    You cant even imagine the scenarios the US has plans for. "What if Morocco develops synthetic life and teleportation and starts using that tech to invade the Philippines?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    It would be ironic if what stops Russia's invasion war in Europe is the risk of Chinese annexation of Eastern Russia.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    This is essentially the plot of Tom Clancy's The Bear and The Dragon. Bad book, don't recommend it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Doubtful it will be as binary as west and east Germany. Russia is made up of several separate countries with their own identities. It will be much more chaotic in my lay-man's opinion. Hopefully some of those countries are able to create their own blocs in the event that Moscow falls

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Wait I thought NetEase made video games

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    They absolutely do, they just do other stuff, too.

    The company provides online services with content, community, communications, and commerce. It operates a news website at news.163.com and an associated app.[5][6] NetEase has an on-demand music-streaming service (NetEase Cloud Music). Video games the company has developed include, Fantasy Westward Journey, Tianxia III, Heroes of Tang Dynasty Zero, Ghost II, Marvel Rivals, and Destiny: Rising. NetEase operates the Chinese version of Blizzard Entertainment games, such as World of Warcraft, StarCraft II, and Overwatch. It also created an Android emulator for PC, called MuMu Player.[7] The company also owns multiple pig farms.[8] In 2023, the company revenue was US$14.6 billion.[9]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetEase

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Sun Tzu would be proud, china still attempting to decieve their way into more territory. They would never fight a war for land, they'll just decieve you about their intentions and economcially bankrupt you until you have to join them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    "A war fought is a war lost." People don't get how much Sun Tzu applies to modern China's strategy. They won't fight you in the field, that's stupid. They'll take control of all your manufacturing capabilities and cripple your infrastructure through dependency. That army? Literally just for show. ICBMs? Intimidation. The real war is economical.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    In December 2024, a video was circulating on Chinese social media that shows how China should conquer parts of Siberia up to lake Baikal.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    I love it when wankies bitch and moan about a websites' credibility and bias when they're critical of the west.

    But if it's critical of the China, Russia, and the like they gather around likes cops at a black persons house circle jerking whos going to shoot him first.

    "Fuck the facts, stop resisting."

    The website is just 4 year old and has the members of the heritage foundation.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20251219213119/https://www.19fortyfive.com/meet-the-team/

    So yea, fuck you hypocrites.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 11 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    If China and Russia are suddenly at odds, who are the tankies going to side with?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    This is an obscure right-wing backed publication / propaganda dissemination tool...

    The following is copy and pasted from:

    https://www.19fortyfive.com/meet-the-team/


    Meet Our Editorial Team

    19FortyFive Core Editorial Staff as of 3/6/2025

    Owner: 19FortyFive Group Corp. based in Maryland. 

    President and Editor-In-Chief: Harry J. Kazianis 

    Senior Editor: Enid Burns

    Senior Editor: Stephen Silver 


    19FortyFive Columnists 

    The experts below write either daily or weekly for 19FortyFive. 

    James Jay Carafano: Heritage Foundation 

    Daniel L. Davis: Defense Priorities 

    Robert Farley: University of Kentucky

    Robert E. Kelly: Pusan National University (Faculty Page)

    Andrew Latham: (Daily Columnist) Macalester University 

    Andrew A. Michta (Weekly Columnist for 19FortyFive), Atlantic Council 

    Kyle Mizokami: Popular Mechanics 

    Michael Peck: CEPA 


    Defense and National Security Staff 

    Note: We have also included links to their expert affiliation for transparency and clarity.

    Military Technology Editor: Kris Osborn 

    Defense Editor: Reuben F. Johnson 

    Defense In-Depth Editor: Sebastien Roblin

    YouTube Video Editor and Presenter: Jon Jaxon


    Contributing Editors as of 2/26/2025

    Note: For transparency, we have also included links to their current expert affiliation.

    W. James Antle, Washington Examiner 

    Salvatore Babones, University of Sydney

    Doug Bandow, CATO Institute

    Anna Borshchevskaya, The Washington Institute 

    Douglas Bulloch

    Ted Galen Carpenter, CATO Institute

    Gordon G. Chang, Author and Journalist 

    Mackenzie Eaglen, American Enterprise Institute 

    Andrew Erickson, U.S. Naval War College 

    Seth J. Frantzman: Jerusalem Post 

    Daniel Goure, Lexington Institute

    David Hambling, Forbes Magazine

    Anthony W. Holmes, Former U.S. Defense Department Offical 

    Jason Killmeyer

    Bruce Klingner, Heritage Foundation 

    Scott B. MacDonald, Smith’s Research and Gradings

    David Maxwell, Foundation for Defense of Democracies 

    Julian McBride: SOFREP

    Wilson VornDick, RANE Network Analyst, DUCO, and China Aerospace Studies Institute

    Web Developer: FocusWP

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    How poetic

    You reap what you sow I guess

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    In December 2024, a video was circulating on Chinese social media that shows how China should conquer parts of Siberia up to lake Baikal.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    On one hand, we live in interesting times. On the other hand, if the world does swing back towards peace, a Trans-Siberian Railway rebuilt to Belt And Road HSR standards will be pretty cool.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    NetEase owns Quantic Dream (guys who made Heavy Rain etc.). Small world eh

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/globalnews@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    In December 2024, a video was circulating on Chinese social media that shows how China should conquer parts of Siberia up to lake Baikal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment