Elon Musk initially promised that DOGE would slash $2 trillion in ‘waste, fraud and abuse,’ a goal that was later reduced to $1 trillion

The world’s richest man, who dramatically exited the White House in May after a public feud with Donald Trump, initially promised that DOGE would slash $2 trillion in “waste, fraud and abuse,” a goal that was later reduced to $1 trillion and eventually $150 billion.

DOGE claimed to have slashed tens of billions of dollars in expenditures, but it was impossible for outside financial experts to verify that because the agency did not provide detailed public accounting of its work.

But analysis by think tanks and The New York Times concluded that, despite DOGE’s claims, spending actually went up in 2025.

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 77 points 10 months ago (1 child)

Th point of DOGE was to let a rich dude destroy the parts of the government that were keeping him from breaking labor laws, breaking aviation safety rules, polluting the environment, stealing the personal info of every American and many other things. Saving money was never a goal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Was there any doubt. Do people actually believe the noise Trump makes???

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 17 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    The article doesn't say DOGE is the cause of the increase of spending. It states that the purpose of DOGE was to reduce waste and cut spending, but federal government spending has gone up in 2025 from 2024.

    This article is stating the obvious, to those who didn't buy the lies Trump and Musk were selling, but backed up the assertion with financial data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    How I know you didn't read the article or your reading comprehension is abysmal:

    "DOGE failed to cut spending because most federal spending was for entitlement programs, where spending remains high due to structural reasons and policy autopilot,” CATO’s analysis continued. “Congress alone has the authority to cut these programs, so it’s unsurprising that DOGE did not reduce spending.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Banjo does not read anything that does not conform to his world view. Their last account frequently would link articles and studies that disagrees with their points and cherry pick sentences within paragraphs saying otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    We are all definitely under reacting to the scale of damage done by DOGE. It's irreversible and extremely bad. There need to be a lot of things done going forward but holding these ghouls to account is a high priority.

  • source