On Monday, the US Department of the Interior announced that it was pausing the leases on all five offshore wind sites currently under construction in the US. The move comes despite the fact that these projects already have installed significant hardware in the water and on land; one of them is nearly complete. In what appears to be an attempt to avoid legal scrutiny, the Interior is blaming the decisions on a classified report from the Department of Defense.

The second Trump administration announced its animosity toward offshore wind power literally on day one, issuing an executive order on inauguration day that called for a temporary halt to issuing permits for new projects pending a re-evaluation. Earlier this month, however, a judge vacated that executive order, noting that the government has shown no indication that it was even attempting to start the re-evaluation it said was needed.

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Don Quijote looking for power companies bribery money...

latest excuse as silly as Cervantes' character

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe, lord knows he'll have his price, but dude legitimately hates wind power because "it's ugly." Sometimes our particular burgeoning dystopia reminds me most of the Twilight Zone with the omnipotent and petulant child.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Trump is guaranteeing the US will be at the bottom of the energy sector in the near future.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Thank the Christian god the birds are safe! All praise king Trump.

    /s

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    And, by "US government", we are talking about a government captured by Republicanism/conservatism.

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/climate_apocalypse@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    So we are back to department of defense ?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    So, kill everyone in charge, or as good as drink bleach?

    You're doing one of the two right now. All of us are.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago*

    I wrote about this in another thread, there is one legitimate reson to not have offshore powerplants, defense.

    I'll edit and put a link to the comment shortly.

    EDIT:

    https://lemmy.zip/comment/23502150

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Can't have a weak point in energy production if we're going to start ww3.

    I hate this so much.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago
    2 comments in c/politics@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    They know their “reason” wouldn’t fly under scrutiny.

    The politicians want to know everything about the citizens but then they try to hide their own actions that involves taxpayer money.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Wind and solar are left wing politics. -MAGA

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/arstechnica_index@ibbit.at view that post
    [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    There is actually a decent reason for this.

    Offshore infrastructure is highly exposed to sabotage, a sub with a few divers could easily fit remote explosives to the structure, the foreign power could then destroy them during an energy crisis or similar event.

    Hell, they could simply torpedo the infrastructure directly.

    This is a real risk, but plenty of people just treat it like a pretext to not build renewables, which I suspect it is in this case.

    My point is that, yes there is a strategic risk to building offshore infrastructure, but it is a risk that can be dealt with, as long as the capacity of the offshore windfarm is redundant, then it is perfectly fine to use them.

    You can even export the surplus power when you get it.

  • source