Is AI always going to be stuck at its current level? Is there no way to improve it?
post
Both groups were asked to research how to start a vegetable garden, with some participants randomly selected to use AI, while others were asked to use a search engine. According to the study’s findings, those who used ChatGPT gave much worse advice about how to plant a vegetable garden than those who used the search engine.
This seems like not quite the same thing as the implied effective brain damage from the headline.
I welcome you all to my level. 🙂↕️
Have you read The Time Machine book where the humans in the future were all morons and weak because we turned the world into a safe place that didn’t represent any challenge for us anymore?
The author described them like gnomes just playing around with the intelligence of little children.
Right above this post:
“My Couples Retreat With 3 AI Chatbots and the Humans Who Love Them“ top article on wired
That's why I limit my use of it to moronic activities, like replying to brain-dead customers who can't read five lines of text. If I didn't, I wouldn't be able to restrain myself from insulting them, probably.
I use it to help me correct my grammar and punctuation. It's great at fixing those problems. Other than that, it's just been a fever dream
If you use the LLM by itself it’s nothing beyond a toy, but I like to have personal coding projects indexed in a way I can discuss things like suggestions on what to do next, looking for mistakes etc.
Not everything you use LLMs for need accuracy, for example brainstorming is a very interesting activity for us humans, trying to see where your flaws in understanding a certain subject.
To be honest, you could do that just by writing (hence why writing is such an important activity), but I think for the majority of people discussing a problem with an LLM is easier than staring at a blank piece of paper.
As opposed to learning how grammar and punctuation work yourself, and being more knowledgeable.
Eh. People do just fine at that without AI, what difference does it really make?
Replace "using AI" with "managing undergrads" and all the experiments are obvious (yes, you can't quote a paper you asked an undergrad to write) and all the headlines are insane (no, you are not a moron for asking an undergrad to write the report).
Science predicts people will become so stupid they won't even be able to figure out a way to blame it on boomers.
Nuh uh I asked gpt and it said: The impact of AI on human intelligence and decision-making depends largely on how we choose to use and integrate these technologies. AI can serve as a powerful tool to enhance learning, creativity, and problem-solving when used thoughtfully. However, there is a concern that over-reliance on AI for basic tasks or critical thinking might lead to skill atrophy or reduced mental engagement in certain areas.
Ultimately, AI's influence on human cognition will depend on factors such as education, individual habits, and societal norms. Promoting responsible use, critical thinking, and continuous learning can help ensure that AI complements rather than diminishes human intelligence.

all 21 comments