no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
6 comments in c/hockey@lemmy.ca view that post
[–] 2 points 11 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Curious, why? Isn’t everyone used to 200 ft at this point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    No nhlers, appeals to countries where hockey is popular enough to have their own league.

    There was concern it wouldn’t be finished construction in time so this means it’s going ahead which helps people who already made travel plans.

    NHL’s argument for having smaller rinks is that it makes the game more exciting (It’s just to fit more seats), so we will have uber exciting hockey.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I was told that they fucked up when building it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Measure twice, cut once! Jeez! 🤦‍♂️

    But I think they were asking why the other user says this is good. How is the play field being under regulation size good news?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago*

    ...they were asking why the other user says this is good.

    Uhh oops. Read good not always do I.

    Thanks. I'm gonna go for a long walk and smoke a nice doobie and think about what I've done

  • source
  • parent