top 51 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 88 points 11 months ago (4 children)

What about work requirements? Drug testing? Can they use the money on soda and fast food?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I'm guessing we will never see any Faux segments on how that one farmer saved up some of his handout and {shock, horror!} used it to {clutches pearls} buy steak. And {collapses on fainting couch} LOBSTER!

    It is so weird to me how the people that supposedly loooove the "free market" lose their minds the minute they see someone select their own food when given food benefits? The same people that fall all over themselves worshipping utter slime like Donvict just because he happens to be wealthy and think he should never have to face any consequences want to police the nutritional intake of the very poorest people...

    https://www.mediamatters.org/washington-post/ny-bill-barring-food-stamp-recipients-luxury-food-items-comes-straight-fox-news

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    Meth would probably be less popular in rural communities if we stopped farmer subsidies. There's no data to show that, but let's assume and do it anyways just to make sure. Can't waste those tax dollars on drugs that don't make corporations money!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 85 points 11 months ago

    Welfare queens.

  • source
  • [–] 65 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    True MAGA farmers should reject payouts from the government, because that's socialism and socialism is BaAaAaD

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 38 points 11 months ago

    How about them bootstraps, huh?

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    Vast majority of this funding will get vacuumed up by corporate farms and continue to leave most small family/independents out to dry

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 11 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    I'm not so sure that's true. There is a shit load of land used to grow corn to make ethanol that's farmed by independent farmers. In the US most farmland is used for soy beans and corn for livestock feed or fuel. It wouldn't be a simple or cheap undertaking, but that last could be utilized more efficiently to directly or indirectly fees people.

    I would also bet there are enough people that would love to be farmers that can't because land isn't available or cheap that would step up if large farm operations were broken up. That's pure speculation, but even if one mega farm were split 4 ways, that would still be an improvement to the current situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    So then people were just starving to death in the 50's and 60's?

    I seriously doubt it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    We had half the population in the US in 1960, and a bit more than a third of today's number globally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    And we had none of the efficiency, gmo's, and a fraction of the available laborers, and were using smaller amounts of land for farming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    "What we're doing is we're taking a relatively small portion of that [money we made off tariffs], and we're going to be giving and providing it to the farmers in economic assistance.“

    You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the New West. You know... morons.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago

    Yet another "one-time" payment to farmers... must be another year with trump in the white house: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/14/donald-trump-coronavirus-farmer-bailouts-359932

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Ok. So then what about next year when the tarrifs are still in place and fucking over farmers?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 11 months ago

    Well, hopefully that's after the midterms and if they don't like it, well fuck it. Donvict won't care as long as he has a compliant Congress to kowtow to every bullshit decree he bleats out on his Xitter knockoff.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    So, he's taking our money that we're forced to pay due to his stupid tariffs and is using some of it to payoff his supporters who he screwed over with those same tariffs. So, forcing everyone else to clean up his messes. Classic trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    Well. Trump is using the income from the tariffs to pay the farmers. This is America first at its best. We, the people, pay the tariffs and then that money is used to pay the farmers. The farmers then sale their crops to major corporations. The major corporations the charge us more in the stores to cover the cost of the tariffs we, the people, have to pay. It’s brilliant!!!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    How much of that £12 bn is going to megacorporations versus small farmers?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    I’m trying to figure out here how much farmland is actually owned by farming families and not corporate entities or corporations operating under the “family” banner while being owned by a family that owns shitloads of farms, but I can’t find an honest answer here and the definition of family seems fucking dubious everywhere I’ve looked.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    From his own pocket right? Because his stupid decisions put them in that situation. I would like to see what percentage of money goes to small farms and what money goes to huge corporate farms.

    boosting the farm safety net

    Oh nice that they get one but no one fucking else does.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Of course, but from what I'm understanding these subsidies are going to the farmers who's soybeans weren't bought by China because of Trump's tariffs so they weren't domestic food to begin with. Now they will probably rot somewhere instead. Starvation never entered the picture, this is all about money. I'd love to own a farm, sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    It's a shame their products aren't valued more, since they are the raw materials for so much including life. I still don't support bailing out farmers who voted for this. I guess I would rather bail out farmers than bankers or oil barons or ranchers, as if I have a choice. Anyways, we can't be sure this money is even going to the right people with this admin.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    It's like driving through town and throwing coins out the window.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    So the argument is that since the executive is collecting the tariffs, it can spend them directly without Congress?

    Isn't the IRS also an executive agency?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Last time I checked they aren't making any arguments unless they are sued.

    Why Trump thinks he can spend any revenue without congressional permission is beyond me. It is clear his administration does not care for the rule of law. They are a criminal organization.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Once the small farmers realize Trump is coming for their land it will be too late.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Look it's me, a farmer.

  • source
  • 24 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [S] 20 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Didn't this genius do nearly the same thing in his first failed term?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago

    And 95% or more will most likely go to corporate megafarms and leave the small farms out to dry.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago

    Less than he gave to argentina

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago

    Sounds like welfare

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Such a bunch of socialists. :)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Must be all those welfare queens we keep hearing about

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 11 months ago

    These farmers are what Chomsky means when he talks about "worthy victims". I'm sure many of these people voted for Donvict knowing that he'd be harming lots of people, including themselves, but based on his first term, that he'd throw some money at them...

    These people deserve welfare because, well, reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Oh noes farmers may actually realize they are being fucked! Let's give them welfare checks. Well not the darkies anyways. Must keep em dumb and voting.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Where does that 12 billion for soybean and corn farmers come from? The people who can't afford their groceries. America has enough corn. America grows corn just to burn it as a gasoline additive. Maybe if the price of corn is falling, it's time to grow something else.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] -19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (12 children)
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    How many of those farmers voted for trump? You reap what you sow, farms should know that. But many farmers have learned you reap a huge welfare check when you sow hatred so they keep doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 11 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] [S] 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Depends on what they are farming and what you mean by "everyone".

    The article says most of this will go to those that produce soybeans and corn - most of that is livestock feed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I don't eat livestock. About 6% of Americans are vegetarian, proving that plenty of people do w/o livestock and don't starve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    The majority of the farms around me are cash crops, not providing food for survival. I'm in central California and all I see here is almonds, pistachios, tomatoes and cows. We need to get rid of these since it's just wasted space that's doomed to fail as it's using up valuable resources to profit the few that own them.

    We have one acre and we grow a variety of different veggies, trying to grow with sustainable methods like regenerative farming practices. We trade with other like minded people and my wife donates excess to the local church to help feed the poor. We need more people doing this and less of the big corporate farmers lining their pockets while everyone else suffers.

    Screw these bailouts

  • source
  • parent