all 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 88 points 1 year ago*

Are those load-bearing furring strips?

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago

    It's fine because there's an equal and opposite balcony on the other side of the house... So they balance each other out.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago

    Just kick them a bit to be sure they are correctly attached.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago

    No. Remove the 2x2s, you’re fucking up an otherwise good aesthetic.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Technically, you could remove them and it would have nearly the same effect.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago

    That's not true at all.

    The bowing out wood underneath makes it look WAY more precarious to the average person. Without some sort of visual out audio cue to signal stress, often people assume that anything that stands without moving and looks intentional is secure.

    In summary, if you remove them, unobservant people will lose out on their opportunity to look upon it with fear.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Laws of physics? They're more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Funny. Nice cantilever balcony

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    All that wood is quite weathered - I'm impressed it's stayed up that long

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

    I'm guessing those pretty beefy joists are cantilevered, and the 2x2s are unnecessary. They were likely added for the joke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It looks like the entire image is tilted, to make it look like the balcony is sagging.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It does have a mild fish-eye to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That thing is waaayyy too long to be cantilevered. 24" of max overhang is a pretty typical standard for deck. That doesn't include the roof. Even with that, they would need to have modified the supporting exterior wall to handle the extra load.

    The question is when not if it's going to fall off the house.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 24" of max overhang is a pretty typical standard for deck.

    Most decks don't have 12" joist supporting them..... Plus, the roof appears to be cantilevered as well.

    modified the supporting exterior wall to handle the extra load.

    Tbh it's hard to tell, it really looks like a house with interesting bones that got wrapped in shitty vinyl in the early 00'. But I'm not seeing any anchoring hardware, so there's a chance that the joists are interconnected with the ones supporting the second floor.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The wood looks weathered, but not rotten. And the joist on the front is probably the most weathered, since it is the most exposed to sun and rain, while the others have been protected by the roof.

    I'd argue for a thorough inspection, and my bet is that most of the joists would be in pretty decent shape. Replace the ones that need replacing, and then sand and stain for better weather resistance in the future. Would probably be a project that takes a couple weekends for a competent DIY-er.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    As long as the room isn't sand or gravel it won't fall. 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Chair needs to be closer to the front, otherwise it's a wasted view.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Looks swell... would def hang after 4 of them 👉🤩🍺🍺🍺🍺👍

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    No, evil grin.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Hi, I'm from the future 👋

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment