I can't tell whether this is irony...
post
6 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
AI pushers using AI to show how legitimately upset they are over other people using AI to review their papers on AI.
That’s just proper dogfooding, right? RIGHT?
“Written”
Using AI to determine if they were generated using AI.
Something like "sowing wind, reaping storms" comes to mind...
5 comments in c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world view that post
... this is basically a FarSide one panel.
Archive link https://archive.ph/1cmjJ
According to some quack snake oil “AI detector” software. This is just an ad for their bullshit “service”.
[deleted]
replies:
2 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
Used a tool to detect AI generated text... zero details about the reference performance with pre-AI text... Fuck off with this nonsense. They are completely useless. Thinking about it, these "tools" are even worse than AI slop, as they flag human work as AI generated. So accuse honest people.
1 comment