Prison population is ridiculously high in America too.
post
Remember that scene in The Shawshank Redemption where it establishes that the corrupt warden was ruining local businesses because he had no labor overhead costs when deploying prisoners all over town to do project work? And then the local businesses started bribing him to stay away from their livelihoods so that they wouldn't go bankrupt?
Same as modern times: except, it's 10,000 times larger in scale now, and the smaller businesses can no longer afford the bribes. But that's okay, because the government stepped in to pay instead.
You know, it doesn't need to be prisoners that strike. Any of us could strike on their behalf, our demand being theirs.
Striking is an effective way to bring about fast, and real change. Of course, the problem is getting enough people on the same page at the same time. But, the first step is spreading the idea that we don't need to strike only on our own behalf, and only if we're part of a union.
Remember, the entire pyramid collapses if consumers stop consuming, and if workers stop working. If enough of us ever get over the fear and ignorance around striking, we could make a huge difference.
the lack of people at protests across the country, excluding the protests that are bankrolled by the billionaires like nokings; is evidence that we're too socially atomized to make this a reality for now; but hopefully not so in the future.
I'm not friends with some old coworkers in large part because they just don't go to protests or do anything. They're comfortable just staying home and playing video games. Extremely basic bros.
That was one of the contributing factors to my career switch as well; software engineers tend to be reactionary (anecdotally) and the only time you can get a response out of them is if they think the status quo is imperiled somehow.
Is it 3% of the population in the streets that lead to change?
all 7 comments