Strike participants, their families, and advocacy groups reported that the leaders and organizers of the strike were punished with solitary confinement, loss of communication privileges, and prison transfers.[4][5][6]

Solitary Confinement

Critics of solitary confinement regard the practice as a form of psychological torture with measurable physiological effects, particularly when the period of confinement is longer than a few weeks or is continued indefinitely.[92][93][94][75]

The United Nations Committee Against Torture cited use of solitary confinement in the United States as excessive and a violation of the Convention Against Torture in 2014.[95]

It followed the little-reported 2016 US Prison Strike

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 34 points 11 months ago (5 children)

You know, it doesn't need to be prisoners that strike. Any of us could strike on their behalf, our demand being theirs.

Striking is an effective way to bring about fast, and real change. Of course, the problem is getting enough people on the same page at the same time. But, the first step is spreading the idea that we don't need to strike only on our own behalf, and only if we're part of a union.

Remember, the entire pyramid collapses if consumers stop consuming, and if workers stop working. If enough of us ever get over the fear and ignorance around striking, we could make a huge difference.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    the lack of people at protests across the country, excluding the protests that are bankrolled by the billionaires like nokings; is evidence that we're too socially atomized to make this a reality for now; but hopefully not so in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not friends with some old coworkers in large part because they just don't go to protests or do anything. They're comfortable just staying home and playing video games. Extremely basic bros.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    That was one of the contributing factors to my career switch as well; software engineers tend to be reactionary (anecdotally) and the only time you can get a response out of them is if they think the status quo is imperiled somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Is it 3% of the population in the streets that lead to change?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I've heard similar numbers tossed around. I'm not sure how consistently people need to be showing up for change to happen. It seems a lot of what we're seeing now is brief protests, and then back to business as usual (pun intended)

  • source
  • parent
  • 7 comments in c/til@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 59 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Prison population is ridiculously high in America too.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    slavery in America never ended, it just got a rebrand

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    We are already enslaved, literally, just in a slightly different form.

    Back when they owned actual slaves, they didn't pay them, but they provided food, clothing, and housing, as poor as it was. Today, they don't have to provide any of that stuff, so they give us a pittance in compensation, barely enough to live slightly better than those slaves of old.

    Sociopathic Oligarchs, with literally unlimited money, would look on someone making $50k a year as the same as paying them virtually nothing.

    In their eyes, we are already slaves, and they want to give us even LESS.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 11 months ago

    Prisoner's rights are human rights.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 11 months ago

    Remember that scene in The Shawshank Redemption where it establishes that the corrupt warden was ruining local businesses because he had no labor overhead costs when deploying prisoners all over town to do project work? And then the local businesses started bribing him to stay away from their livelihoods so that they wouldn't go bankrupt?

    Same as modern times: except, it's 10,000 times larger in scale now, and the smaller businesses can no longer afford the bribes. But that's okay, because the government stepped in to pay instead.

  • source