no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
7 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

Who fucking cares? Fuck these assholes on principle.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Its AI goals are bullshit.

    I hope that their failure crashes Meta.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    From an organizational standpoint, it doesn't sound unreasonable to me.

    The group will be split into four smaller groups, according to a New York Times report. One group will focus on AI research, another one on infrastructure and hardware projects, one on AI products, and another one on building out AI superintelligence, a hypothetical AI system that could outperform human intelligence on any and all scales.

    I mean, they have different skillsets, a fair bit of that is going to be on decoupled timelines, they have different levels of risk, and the technical expertise is going to differ. One succeeding or failing isn't tightly coupled to another doing so. Sure, they all relate to one thing or another to something that has been called "AI", but that's a pretty broad group.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The incredibly great wisdom of Broccoli Boy Zuck

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    This particular coding leaderboard matches my own personal experience. Llama4 is hitting ~15% ; Claude Opus4 ~70% (I haven't used others personally)

  • source