I don't really want companies or anyone else deciding what I'm allowed to see or learn. Are there any AI assistants out there that won't say "sorry, I can't talk to you about that" if I mention something modern companies don't want us to see?

top 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There's plenty of open source models that don't really have any restrictions, you just have to host them yourself (which you can do on your own computer if you have a decent gpu)

for example: mixtral 8x7b

just use koboldcpp or something similar to run the GGUF files and you're good

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I've never personally had issues with 8x7b refusing requests, but I guess I haven't really plumbed the depths on what it might agree or disagree to, I have run it through the ordinary gambit (pretend to be public figure x, make dangerous item y, say untrue thing about company z) and it hasn't given me any problems but sure whatever works for you

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 11 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    You're probably looking for an abliterated model. Be sure you can run it, first, as localhosting models needs high VRAM. You'll want RAM, too, in the case of GGUF models.

    I'd have to write a whole half a book here to explain how to use them, but that information is freely available online. If you don't have a beefy GPU, look into how to host GGUF models.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Dolphin provide uncensored models. Dolphin mixtral 2.5 8x7B was fun back in the days.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I don't think anything is fully uncensored. As for the similar question about least biased I'd say the models from Mistral.

  • source
  • [+] -18 points 11 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 16 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    Except it's not. Search engines are censored and cut up by SEO. I know, I've tried.

    I also don't want to have to sift through all of the scams when I can ask a community for their input.

    I'm blocking you now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Any question you ask on Lemmy can be answered on Google, so what? That's not why people ask.

    People ask because they want to interact with another human about their question. They want to discuss it, ask follow up questions, get multiple points of view, discover a wider field than they expected, etc. If you're just fishing around on Google, you may not even know the proper questions to ask, while opening up the discussion offers the potential to learn stuff from experts you never would have found on your own.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I wouldn't say it's easy to get started...

    You have to know about open source AI models, then you have to know what fine tuning is, then you have to know where to go to get software that runs the models, and then finally you need to know what models are compatible with both AMD and Nvidia graphics cards.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -28 points 11 months ago (19 children)

    All of them have restrictions but I switched from ChatGPT to Grok for this very reason. It's willing to discuss many more things than ChatGPT is.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Good thought, switch to the NaziBot for real truth /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    OP was asking for an uncencored AI assistant - not the most truthful one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Then it's still the wrong choice because Elon intentionally weights the model to give answers he wants, which is as bad (or arguably worse) than straight censorship

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I have only experience with ChatGPT and Grok, and out of those two, it's more often ChatGPT which flat-out refuses to even discuss something, whereas that's less the case with Grok. Neither of them is unbiased, so that same criticism of being weighted differently applies to both models, but that's not really what OP was asking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (13 children)
  • [+] -8 points 11 months ago (12 children)

    I'm not sure what you didn't understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    I understood very good, but still - wtf (is wrong with you)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    If you're expecting me to answer, then you need to be more precise about what it is that you're exactly asking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 11 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    That's just as vague. It has more the tone of a moral judgment than a sincere question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 11 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    A false dichotomy fallacy, also known as a false dilemma, occurs when an argument presents only two options as the only possibilities, ignoring other viable alternatives. This oversimplification can mislead people into thinking they must choose between two extremes when more nuanced options exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments