Were there any advantages over normal trains except cool factor?
post
I love Cold War era "throwing technology at the wall to see what sticks" projects. So many ideas were tried and often the ideas themselves weren't bad but something else was a limiting factor (e.g. our level of material science technology at the time). Even so, they'd often get a lot further than one could reasonably expect, which is rather cool.
Heath was prime minister for this with Thatcher in his cabinet, right? (albeit she was focused on stealing milk from kids at the time)
Neoliberals ruining our country's potential for half a century now 🎉
I mean... this thing just ate energy. The prototype car was pulling 6.5kV off the conducting rails to keep the air jets running hard enough for the hovering, and it wasn't even carrying a passenger load. If you add more weight you have to add more air thrust to keep hovering, which means bigger engines and more power, and the production model will need extras for redundancy because if the air cushion weakens while you're doing 200+kph and the car just grazes the track you're in big trouble. I seriously doubt this concept can scale up to a working transit system and be at all safe. The electricity input alone would be a hazard.
I'll bet it sounded like a Harrier from the outside too.
Also what do you think the vortex is like above the air intakes? I'm imagining this thing cruising along sucking in birds and just flushing them straight down onto the track as it travels the countryside.
It's a shame that these cool things are probably too expensive. The Transrapid, a hover train from Germany, unfortunately also failed to catch on, but at least one commercial line was built in China connecting Shanghai Pudong International Airport with Longyang Road Station in the city, which is still in operation today.
Fucking tech bros. Hovertrains are stupid, inefficient and expensive
Didn't everyone do that in the 70s? Maybe even the us did it (not sure).
all 25 comments