Blued and Finka were removed from Apple's App Store.

LGBTQ+ rights and acceptance have taken another hit in China, with Apple removing two of the countries biggest LGBTQ+ dating apps. Wired reports that Blued and Finka are no longer available on the iOS App Store or certain Android App Stores following orders from the Cyberspace Administration of China, the country's internet regulator and censor.

Apple told Wired that it must "follow the laws in the countries where we operate." Both dating apps were available solely in China, where LGBTQ+ dating apps are minimal — Grindr, for instance, hasn't been available on Apple since 2022. Blued exists internationally under the name HeeSay.

China has increasingly cracked down on LGBTQ+ individuals' rights and groups in recent years, allegedly shuttering large organizations like the Beijing LGBT Center in 2023. For reasons unknown, Blued previously stopped new registrations this past July, with individuals buying second-hand accounts to use the app. However, it reopened in the middle of August.

top 92 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 77 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    china doesnt care if you have tons of cash, thats why asians love westerners that are wealthy or well off, they want to be them. and thats why alot of tend towards conservatism too(at least the older ones) john xina, DWAYNE johnson, and some white influencers cater to the country.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's not about being gay. It's mostly about casual dating/casual sex, which are both a social taboo in China. Most dating apps are basically sex apps, so China bans them. Tinder has been banned for a while. It's the same for LGBT and other apps.

    It probably has something to do with the LGBT movement as well, but I can't say for sure here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    I think it's part of the effort to curb the population decrease. It's not in the culture to pearl clutch about LGBTQ+ people as morally wrong like western cultures.

    They are trying anything to influence people to make babies. Stricter pornography rules, shaming women for not making babies, shaming "feminine men", and that includes banning dating apps that helps indulge in activities that don't help with making babies. Making queer people less visible is unfortunately part of the strategy.

    Though queer media is however not as banned as people think, so far at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 116 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    “Yes, dear leader.” - Timmy Apple

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I’d love to give this a simple upvote. What is Tim Cook’s choice here? Operate illegally in China until the government shuts down their entire source of revenue in an entire market which, also, is the one that produces nearly all of its hardware?

    If he doesn’t do it - shareholders will remove him in the blink of an eye and replace him with someone who will.

    Where I’m agreeing though is - my current phone is my last Apple phone. I’ll be going with Graphene after this. I don’t want corporations telling me what software I can and can’t run on my decides while surveilling me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Same, just holding onto my iPhone 11 till the graphene phone comes out

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Please please please be a good phone. I feel like that’ll be great. I’d like a Linux phone, but I can’t see that shaping up as a Linux reliable daily driver in the next couple of years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The trouble with appeasement is that you’re eventually pushed to the point where you won’t cave anymore. You say no. And they punish you for it.

    And now, all that appeasement has meant nothing. You sold your soul, you didn’t fight back, you did damage to yourself or your reputation or your customers or whatever. But you’re right where you would have been if you didn’t appease at all.

    You have an enemy. If you didn’t, they wouldn’t be making you do terrible things. Do you want to tell them no to their face now? Or after they’ve recruited you into their scheme for years?

    It’s sunk cost fallacy as international strategy and it’s terrible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The trouble with appeasement is that you’re eventually pushed to the point where you won’t cave anymore.

    I thought the trouble with appeasement was that you surrendered turf until you were backed out of a defensible position.

    You have an enemy.

    The Chinese economy is not the enemy of the Apple retail sector. And it never has been. They've been hand-in-glove for decades.

    It’s sunk cost fallacy as international strategy and it’s terrible.

    It's a profit-maximizing strategy and its how every capitalist enterprise operates.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This is literally the same argument that Elon made in defense of censoring Twitter in Turkey.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    I’m sure it is. My point is - what do Lemmy users expect out of a for-profit company operating inside of a capitalistic economic system? Saying “no” to China’s LGBT hating demands is impossible in this situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    What is Tim Cook’s choice here?

    I mean, what was the rationale for the regulation? Its not like enshitification of apps is some novel event unique to American-centric businesses. Did Blued/Finka become a cesspool of degenerate AI slop and scam ads like so many other popular social media platforms? Is there any legitimate reason why this company was targeted beyond "China hates gays"?

    Did the Apple Executives get handed a serious list of problems with the app and choose to de-platform it rather than try and patch a sinking ship? Or is Cook just a cuck for Chinese Communism?

    I don’t want corporations telling me what software I can and can’t run on my decides while surveilling me.

    Cheers to that. But if you're side-loading everything, you're not really worried about what's hosted on the Apple Store to begin with. Why is an executive decision to delist an app from a proprietary service a problem?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Devils advocate:

    …It’s kinda strategic for Apple to “stay.”

    Let’s say they say no, and get kicked out of China. You think the Chinese tech giants are going to put up a fight about dating apps?

    Seems better to Apple to keep a finger in the pie and do what they can get away with, if only for the LGBTQ folks.


    Another example I used to point to is Steam which got away with sneaking a lot of culture into China under the government's nose. And it’s cause they didn’t make loud trouble.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    China has increasingly cracked down on LGBTQ+ individuals’ rights and groups in recent years

    Yeah, it has a conservative streak disguised as post-Deng communism where the only freedom there is to make money and rip off another fellow citizen, anywhere from dating scams and pig butchering to tofu-dreg products.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago*

    Part of the problem with "China Bad" articles is that they tend to report "Thing Happened" without diving into the "Here's Why". If you get past the Engadget article that's just a four paragraph click-through/reprint of the Wired article and read the original piece, there's at least a bit more meat on the bone.

    https://www.wired.com/story/apple-removes-gay-dating-apps-china-app-store/

    In July, Blued abruptly stopped new user registration without giving an explanation, according to Chinese social media posts. For a month, Chinese users who wanted to get on the platform were paying as much as $20 for secondhand Blued accounts on ecommerce websites. But registration resumed in mid-August.

    In 2020, BlueCity, the parent company of Blued, went public. It announced that the app had over 49 million registered users and over 6 million monthly active users. The same year, BlueCity said it was acquiring Finka, its main competitor in China, for about $33 million. The company delisted in 2022 and was acquired by Newborn Town, a Hong Kong–listed social media firm. Most of the longtime employees of Blued, including its founder Ma Baoli, left the company after the acquisition, says a former Blued employee who asked not to be named for privacy reasons.

    In 2024, Blued rebranded its international version of the app to HeeSay, which became popular among users in India, Pakistan, and the Philippines, according to The Wall Street Journal. HeeSay remains available in app stores.

    So the apps merged, then were traded, had the team gutted, and the app pivoted to serving an entirely new audience of users.

    Why would this provoke a response from a Chinese regulator? Idk. Would be great to find out further details from the news outlet itself, rather than just getting another "China hates gay people" superficial response.

    It doesn't look like the Cyberspace Administration of China purged all gay dating apps from their behind-the-firewall app store. So it seems premature to conclude this is a new vast pogrom against gay dating. Was Blued/Finka filling up with scams to the point that a regulator stepped in? Was there some kind of personal beef between the new owners and the Chinese regulatory agency? Did a bribe not get paid? Is this actually the beginning of a vast pogrom against all dating apps?

    No fucking clue. And nobody doing the reporting seems to be interested in following up and asking.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Ok so... make an app for finding "friends" and leave it up to users to discuss whether they want to slob knobs or paint miniatures or whatever

  • source
  • [+] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Apple told Wired that it must “follow the laws in the countries where we operate.”

    Businesses always lie about supporting queer causes. They only care about the money.

    If it was more profitable to be fascist nazis, that's what they would do.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    As someone else mentioned, if he didn't cave & risked losing the China market, the board would replace him in a heartbeat with someone who will do whatever it takes to keep the money flowing.

    I can only imagine this pains him to do seeing as he's gay himself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Remember that above all else, rich people identify as rich. All the divides on gender or sexual/romantical preferences are secondary to the rich yes/no question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • No argument there, but that's the job. I'm not weeping for him, but at the same time I expect he doesn't personally like it. Most of us run into situations in our lives where we have to do things we ordinarily wouldn't - if you haven't yet, you likely eventually will.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 72 points 1 year ago (52 children)

    Look out, the tankies will swarm to deny that this problem exists.

  • source
  • hideshow 52 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (50 children)

    pink washing is a thing and the americans are the at it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 50 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (47 children)

    Yea it's American pink washing we're discussing here, not China's crackdown on LGBTQ people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 47 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (46 children)

    the pinkwashing is the distraction and you're falling for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (45 children)

    I wonder if the Chinese LGBTQ community feels that way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (44 children)

    they're on chinese social media and i interact with them on rednote; you can too.

    i highly recommend it, it does a lot to dispel american propaganda; the biggest things i learned form them is that they believe things that are true about us are chinese gov't propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 44 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (43 children)

    Doesn't answer the question at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (42 children)

    it will if you try for yourself instead of making assumptions based on uncritically accepting american propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (41 children)

    I've checked, they're understandably not happy about being discriminated

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (40 children)

    which platform and which influencers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (39 children)

    RedNote for example. Not "influences", just regular people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (38 children)

    the queer influencers on rednote say otherwise

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (37 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (36 children)

    share the people you're following on rednote and we can find out

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (35 children)

    Are you asking me to doxx vulnerable people?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (34 children)

    i'm asking you to back up your assertion by sharing the people who are already sharing themselves on rednote; so there's no doxxing application here.

    i'm a queer on rednote and its algorithms show me queer content and creators and i have yet to see one echo a sentiment that matches your assertion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (33 children)

    I won't direct hostile state attention to vulnerable people, sorry not sorry

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (32 children)

    that sounds unhinged.

    is this hostile state attention in the room with us? lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (31 children)

    Sorry to be worried about vulnerable groups in a country that's discriminating against them. I'm sure it helps them a lot that you're moving the discussion away from them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (30 children)

    the only thing to be sorry about is your avoidance of the question; you're the one who's not responding with evidence to support your assertion.

    i'm seeking it because i'm already an online member of the chinese queer community and i never heard your sentiment shared; if it exists, i want to know about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (29 children)

    You're using some "influencers" as your source rather than actual normal people. You've been had.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (28 children)

    a very real possibility; which is why i want your sources.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (27 children)

    It's just normal people I know privately. I wouldn't feel comfortable sharing their accounts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (26 children)

    the normal people i know privately say the opposite and they're heavily politically engaged; they would know more than your people from that alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (25 children)

    You don't know anything about the people I've met though, so that's a weird assertion to make

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (24 children)

    it's an assertion that makes sense given that you accepted this pinkwashing propaganda at face value and tried to defend it; anyone that you associate with will have a similar disposition since birds of a feather flock together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (23 children)

    You're pretty keen on assumptions

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (22 children)

    it's the only thing there is since you won't won't provide any evidence to back up your claim and you're bought into pink washing propaganda from a source that has a history of peddling propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (21 children)

    Saying the China's discrimination of LGBTQ people is just pinkwashing is giving off sus vibes tbh. I'm gonna trust the people who actually live there and face that discrimination

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    i talk to chinese queers everyday via rednote and can attest that gay discrimination is definitely a thing in china; but it comes from its people and not the government.

    this is pink washing because it meant to make americans believe that the government is doing the discriminating and there's no clearer sign of this than a source that has been caught red handed peddling propaganda in the past as well as selective talking point that focuses grindr when other grindr-like platforms are used in china, but completely ignored by this piece of propaganda.

    you would do well to develop some media literacy so that you won't be brainwashed by future propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (19 children)

    Unfortunately the Chinese government is active in discriminating against LGBTQ community and try to show pro-LGBTQ stuff in similar light to you, some foreign influence operation. It's fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (18 children)

    are you going to share the decryption key for this ultra cryptic message? lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (17 children)

    What part are you having trouble with? I think it's pretty straightforward but I'm not a native speaker

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (16 children)

    try to show pro-LGBTQ stuff in similar light to you, some foreign influence operation.

    this describes western propaganda and there's no history of this; but you insist that it has something to do with the chinese government.

    sources that are not part of the US state department are needed to verify it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (15 children)

    I'm talking about Chinese government's way of trying to label pro-LGBTQ movements inside China as some foreign influence operation. You are doing something very similar. That's what I mean with the quoted part. Hope that helps

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (14 children)

    yes, it does help and it's not me whose doing it; it's an established fact that the american congress has publically admitted to doing many times in the past and to many countries across the world; most notably in north korea

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (13 children)

    I can't say that I know much about North Korea's LGBTQ situation but trying to paint members of China's LGBTQ community trying to advocate for better treatment as some foreign influence operation is wild.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (12 children)

    no, you're the one trying to paint it queer advancement as foreign influence while this article is clearly pink washing.

    not only have you not backed up your assertions, you keep on changing the topic; so it's become clear that you don't have anything to offer on the topic other than echoing propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (11 children)

    You're the one talking about American propaganda and pink washing, while I wanted to focus on what the actual Chinese LGBTQ community feels about the discrimination they face. You seem to be claiming first that it doesn't exist and now that it's not the government doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    you're conflating your expectations with reality. this article is propaganda, the chinese queer community feels like they're on their own and expect discrimination to come from their peers rather than their government and you would know this if you really were on rednote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

    I'd rather believe the actual victims of that discrimination I've talked to, tbh, than you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    the problem is that you're not talking to them; you're taking in a propagandized version of them that are getting paid to say those things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    I'm sure these regular people I'm talking to are secretly CIA because they complain about the discrimination lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    you're not talking to anyone and the real funny part is that my gov't has admitted several times publicly that they do this, but people like you still believe it's a conspiracy theory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    So the people I know don't exist but they're also CIA spies. I guess that's easier for you to stomach than the idea that China doesn't treat their minorities well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    you're not talking to any queers in china; the cia has spies everywhere; and you're changing the subject again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    "It didn't happen and if it did it was CIA operation" hah classic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    it's interesting how you conflate 2 things that are barely related to each other, in this case:

    1. you're not talking to queers in china; but are pretending that you are to double down on your beliefs.
    2. the american government has repeatedly admitted publically that it run propaganda factories throughout the world and especially in china.

    i guess i can see how you get the 2 thing confused with one another since they're tangentially related to china and i would too if i too refused to do some light reading to educate myself about the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're the one who started talking about it being American propaganda though, as you would ofc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    that's exactly what this article is.

    the article makes it sound like the chinese government is cracking down on queers by getting rid of grindr when the reality is that the american government forced the chinese to sell their ownership of grindr and chinese queers prefer to use grindr alternatives anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›