all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 50 points 1 year ago*

They should have added 123 like most companies to make it crack proof.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Never put your company name in a password. Always use one of your competitors. They should have used 'BritishMuseum' or something

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    This doesn't surprise me at all.

    At Circle K, the video system in the back uses "police" to access the footage so they can review and make a copy. Not sure if that's the only access level, wouldn't be surprised given how old many of those systems still are.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    That is so unbelievably funny

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I'm honestly not THAT surprised. If there's a high turnaround and little of value they can take from direct access, then you'd want it more accessible than secure. And since the value in an art museum is physical, the camera footage isn't worth nearly as much. Plus, how tech-savvy are the owners of an art museum going to be?

    Still, you'd expect a number, at the very least. Or something like MonaLisa14. Something you change every 6 months. Louvre is WAY too default.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Passwords in video games...

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Those clever geniuses!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Not a bad idea. Definitely easier to remember than the strings I tend to use: 35$?:5&?}^!,%*!bghkvgjnvfuBFGJBCFUNbfyjvct!,58’crrydgjm€?~%+’cWhxukbYjvJCFUB

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    All’s fair in Louvre and war

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Should have been Paris

  • source