Justices grill administration over imposition of steep duties as Sotomayor says: ‘I just don’t understand this argument’

The US supreme court appeared skeptical of the legal basis of the Trump administration’s sweeping global tariff regime on Wednesday after justices questioned the president’s authority to impose the levies.

Justices heard oral arguments on Wednesday morning on the legality of Donald Trump’s tariffs , a crucial legal test of his controversial economic strategy – and power.

Even conservative justices sounded doubtful of the strength of the Trump administration’s position. “The vehicle is the imposition of taxes on Americans, and that has always been a core power of Congress,” said Chief Justice John Roberts.

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 43 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Even if the tariffs stop this moment, the prices are already up. They don't go down.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    They do if you force greedy ceo's to put them back down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    and then issued a 6-3 unsigned order affirming them, without opinion.

    /s

    I hope /s

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    1 things is for sure: The money isn't coming back to the consumer. If they have to return any funds it's our taxes that are going up to pay for it.

    We get shafted from both ends.

    And it should be as clear as constitutional crystal that it wasn't legal to begin with.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean, the money that was gathered is a tax, so returning all of it would be a wash.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    For the government's books, sure (if anything, it was a 0% interest loan, which is probably better than a wash strictly speaking)

    But for society in general - the money was gathered from consumers but will be getting returned to businesses, so not a wash at all

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago*

    Aww yeah. Expressed skepticism is just ten, or twenty steps away from a SLAM!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Imagine if SCOTUS stops MAGA from hurting itself in the midterms..

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's what I was speculating. Clearly, SCOTUS can see that the tariffs are hurting America and especially Americans, so this is a backdoor way of taking the ball from Trump for his own good.

    That, or they are sick of having to pay more for their morning coffee because Trump wants a better deal for his buddy Bolsonaro.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments