all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Wasn't that the whole point of the scene?

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • Yup. The Rohirrim see this Elf standing there bitching at this maybe-Gondorian, maybe the King of the West, maybe just another weird Ranger, and the two of them are obviously arguing in a foreign language like the Rohirrim don't matter (which is how Men see Elves - stuck-up and isolationist, ignorant of the plight of Men), and then the Ranger says something that cuts straight to their own philosophy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 24 points 1 year ago

    Good point actually. It's been a while since I've watched these films and I remember this scene being emotional but I don't think I thought about it too hard beyond that. But you're right, he probably purposely says that in a language they'll understand, to be on their level and an honest leader.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -41 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    ....yeah, but it's still bad writing...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    ...<insert wrong opinion here>...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Seriously, nearly every single one of this guy’s comments are bookended with ellipses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    He is switching it up from xXxxXx maybe? 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    ...ad hominem takes your argument down...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)
    1. It is not an argument, it is a joke comment, it is not trying to persuade anyone of anything. It is a lighthearted joke.

    2. Making a comment about someone's writing style isn't ad-hominem, also the original comment didn't make an argument at all, it just said that your opinion is wrong, which is a joke as an opinion literally can't be factually incorrect by definition. Here is a pretty good resource for learning about ad-hominem in practice.

    That being said, you also fell into the very common fallacy fallacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Why do you say that? I disagree

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Finnish people hear Finnish gibberish instead actually

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    We’re gonna die!?
    “I thought these guys were gonna help us?”
    Oh what are they gonna do? Skateboard down the steps and shoot a bunch of bad guys?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I didn't see no wheels on that shield, it was clearly snowboarding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's called shieldsurfing noobs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Farmers. Stableboys. These are no soldiers.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yeah I was honestly struggling to find the right word for this title lol. Soldiers definitely doesn't feel right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Soldiers definitely doesn't feel right

    Rohirrim, perhaps?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Even more epic, honestly

  • source