all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 64 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I bet if you asked Alan Turing about Al, he'd say he prefers to be called Alan

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 36 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Also Alan Turing if he were alive today: "We now have access to billions of times more computing power than I did, and the world uses it for what!?"

    Edit: A major flaw with Turing's premise is that the test is not time-bound. At first blush, a conversation with an LLM is kind of miraculous compared to what we had before. But ample exposure to any LLM reveals its lack of intelligence; it just takes time.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 34 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    This here is a USB charger. It uses a CPU to figure out if you connected a Samsung Phone for 50W charging, or if it should do the default 2.5W charging profile.

    It's processing power? Uhhh, about 4Million clocks/sec with 640,000 bytes of memory. Oh yeah I guess about 5-million bits.

    Oh this other thing? That's a mouse. It tells the computer if my hand moved forward or backwards or left or right. It runs a fourier transform over an infrared image and memorizes the desk. It performs a full image process / fourier transform 100 times a second to accurately track our hands and clicks. The USB connection is also a network of networks consisting of a ReedSolomon error correction code for reliable transmission at a bit over 10-million baud transfer rate.


    Our real computers are doing... Porn. AI generated porn.


    Fun fact: USB Chargers have more processing power and RAM than fucking the Lunar Lander / Apollo Space Program. Figuring out if Samsung phone or not-samsung Phone has so much processing power allocated to the task it's kind of hilarious

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 5 points 1 year ago

    Idk. The people I know who use LLMs the most are also the people who use human pronouns on them and think they're conscious. It's like the people who use them a medium amount who aren't fooled, and I think it's because the people who get really really into it are just all in mo matter what and just ignore any issues and the people who had a few conversations and were amazed don't get a lot of utility out of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I think he'd have been mostly pissed that acceptance of non-religious sexual morality was less than 15 years from when he died.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [โ€“] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I guess it all depends on context. If somebody did a Turing Test about 10 years ago with GPT-5 level LLMs I guess it would have fooled practically everybody. Today everybody knows what modern LLMs are capable of so we would als different questions. For example "Let's play tic tac toe" ๐Ÿคฃ

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Given that the framing of the Turing test was as a man pretending to be a woman, one wonders whether Turingโ€™s pronouns today would still be he/him.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    What do you even mean with "aren't real"?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [โ€“] 30 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Turing devised the Turing test as a way of ever confirming whether or not an AI is "alive": if it can fool humans into thinking it's another human and not a machine, then it passes.

    The recent advances in llms show quite clearly that it turns out you can fool humans into thinking you're also a human quite easily, thus he would probably revise his test.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Today's "artificial intelligence" has no real intelligence. No more than your phone's autocorrect. At best, it is simulated intelligence. We should call it "fake intelligence."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They are still real, though.

    Unless Leon is right, what again, makes way more sense than what I see around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 1 year ago

    Is there Alan Turing fan fiction, where he time travels towards better days?

  • source
  • [โ€“] 4 points 1 year ago

    If you can easily trip up AIs by asking certain questions. Do they really pass the Turing test?

  • source