US President Donald Trump has filed an appeal to overturn his May 2024 criminal conviction in the hush-money payment case, arguing he is shielded by presidential immunity.

Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records by a unanimous jury in New York.

In December, citing Trump's imminent return to the White House, a New York judge sentenced Trump to an unconditional discharge, meaning he would not serve time or pay a fine.

"This case should never have seen the inside of a courtroom, let alone resulted in a conviction," Trump's lawyers said in the latest filing.

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 54 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Ridiculous. He wasn't president when the crime occurred, he wasn't president when the trial happened.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'll be happy to be proven wrong, ecstatic even, but watch as he gets his way because the judiciary is too chicken shit to uphold 'all men are equal under the law'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    It's been awhile since I was reading about this when it first came up, but I believe part of the issue is his "presidential immunity" would have made how some of the evidence was obtained no longer valid given the immunity. It's all BS.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Remember when even having a criminal charge against you was disqualifying for the presidency?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Or being a pedophile that rapes children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I miss the days when things like condiment choice and suit colors were among the more controversial things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Can we appeal the sentencing (or absolute lack of)?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    ELI5: Why is this even of interest to him? If he ignores it, it has already gone away. If he brings it up, it returns to public attention. what a dipshit weirdo!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Does this open the possibility for a less-corrupt judge to revisit sentencing, rather than the dishonorable Juan M Merchan’s shameful non-sentence?

  • source