all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 year ago

If we're going to do this, might at well let Chinese EVs into the country

  • source
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago

    Mark Carney loves supporting maga, he's such a corrupt pm.

  • source
  • 23 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Treason. Long past time to repatriate essential services. A hostile authoritarian foreign government is buying assets unchecked.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Thanks for listing even more US companies for me to boycott for life.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Great… I’d been going to Esso instead of Petro Canada because of this; now where do I go?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago*

    Manitoba and west: Co-op

    DOMO

    You should have your local independent or smaller chain station anywhere in Canada. If you can trust the quality of gas, they tend to be significantly cheaper than nearby branded stations.

    Vancouver: Super Save, Canco

    Toronto: Amco Petroleum

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    As far I read, the oil extraction companies working in Alberta are mostly American too.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Wtf, Canada?

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    CoOp, CanCo and... Costoco? Those seem to be relatively "Canadian" options.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Wasn't there an American company that owned a natural gas company in BC that had actually raised prices on its gas for Canadians just for shits and giggles?

    The same could happen here.

    These natural resources should be nationalized. Period. They're too critical to be left to the capitalist market when you have hostile nations buying them up.

    That and our harbors and ports for ships. Nationalize it all. It's too critical.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So Canada becoming more independent is all bullshit? Business and Corp are the true powers that be. I think I want all my voting money back, if that's a thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 11 points 1 year ago*

    Mark Carney, having been a neoliberal banker all his life, turns out to be a neoliberal banker. At the last election the looming threat of the far right drove Canada back into the arms of the moneyed owners. It's sad to see the country taking this lurch to the right. I hope the NDP can get its act together and be an unashamed left party. If it picks a dynamic, genuine leader who can talk directly about things that matter to people, it can make a comeback like the Green Party looks set to do in the UK, now that their new leader is explicitly calling it a socialist party.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Did you know many of our politicians have dual US-Canada citizenship papers? Some days I have to wonder, what side are they really on?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I voted for Carney specifically so shit like this won't happen... but it did!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The same Carney that wants to pass a bill so the police can demand your ID willy nilly? the same Carney that in another bill wants to install backdoors to various Canadian networks for "surveillance" purposes? The same Carney that in ANOTHER bill wants to block refugee hearings and "stay the course" on Canadas current illegal drug policy which clearly isn't working.

    That Carney?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Me hopes it's because the govt's aiming to curb dependence on raw fuel in the long run and dive right in the EV sector with China and abroad so that he's one step closer to the Emission Reduction plan... Maybe a fallacy but hoping doesn't cost anything.

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post

    Not very cash money tbh

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    What the shit!?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Tax windfall for Canadian government, maybe? Business still has to do business to stay in business. So as long as Canadians benefit, not sure it matters if they're "Trump supported" does it?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Well, it means that profits earned by the Trump supporting business, will support Trump's agenda, which includes annexing / doing harm to Canada. As it's a US corp, it also likely means many of the high paying corporate backend jobs go south, removing high income earners from the tax pool. It's amazing to me that the gov is whining at Canadians about productivity, and grandstanding with 'elbows up' rhetoric, but they greenlight sending jobs to the states.

    And if it's taking a more active role in supporting Trump, given that its such a large market slice, they could manipulate prices to gouge Canadians / do harm to Canada in a more direct fashion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I stand corrected then. Sounds like trash for Canada. Any idea what the government is thinking? I thought it was progressive...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    The current liberal government is far more conservative leaning than the previous one. They're pushing very authoritarian bills, and effectively going along with much of the US's 'stuff', while attempting to spin a pro-Canada message for public support -- like the gov and our media lauding the push to diversify our energy supply by building small nuclear reactors... but glossing over that they require US-provided fuel to run (so we're literally increasing reliance on US stuff, while the US is busy using that dependence to attack us economically). On the authoritarian bills, there's stuff like making it so that law enforcement doesn't need a warrant to get customer information from private companies, and making display of certain symbols/flags a crime. The folks I know who follow this stuff, basically agree that it's all a bit tepid at the moment, but that it's still better than it would've been under our 'official' conservative party, as those guys wanted to straight up do a DOGE-north (and likely still do).

    I'd frame it as Canada is still moving along with the Tech-bro agenda from the US at present, though we're less in to the Christian Nationalist / overtly racist stuff. For example, the coming budget is expected to have items related to OpenBanking/Digital Currencies, which are ideas primarily pushed by tech kleptocrats (there're obvious reasons they fumble to name specific, quantifiable benefits of those systems for consumers -- and it's because the benefit is pretty much all for big tech).

    The party that had a more progressive slant last time around, the NDP, got trounced -- deservedly, as they hadn't really put out anything to persuade voters, and essentially told people to vote liberal if it meant defeating the cons. Our green party, who were even more progressive in policies (and often had big, interesting policy ideas), committed suicide years ago due to their adherence to their party-negative approach to DEI -- they literally elected a black lesbian jewish pro-palestinian lawyer lady as their leader, and she destroyed what little support the party had. Eg. she spent all the campaign finances trying to win a liberal-stronghold riding for herself in Toronto; she demanded full control of all social media accounts for the party, which she was given, but then she proceeded to go to news agencies and comment about how the party wasn't publicly supporting her on social media... the media she controlled... because the party was racist. That sort of thing.

    So, as to what they're thinking, I don't think they view the US as a potential threat to the same extent as the public. And I don't think they're progressive in the old sense of the world, but they're still progressive relative to our southern neighbours. But I mean, that's a really low bar at the moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Thank you kind sir for you time giving me all that background. Sounds like a case of could be a lot worse, bit there's always next time to fuck it up better. DEI is important, but there really are a handful of crazy identitarians who need to be kept away from power if real democratic socialism is to stand a chance of becoming reality in the English speaking world.

  • source
  • parent