Vote passes 52-48 with Republican support in rare bipartisan rebuke of US president’s trade policies

The US Senate on Tuesday approved a measure that would terminate Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs on Brazilian imports, including coffee, beef and other products, in a rare bipartisan show of opposition to the president’s trade war.

The vote passed 52-48.

The resolution, led by Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat of Virginia, seeks to overturn the national emergency that Trump has declared to justify the levies. But it is all but certain to stall in the US House, where the Republican-controlled chamber acted to pre-emptively shut down any attempt to block the president’s tariffs.

all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 51 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Brazilian imports, including coffee, beef and other products

We've found Republicans' limit: Don't fuck with people's coffee.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The legislation passed in a 52-48 vote, with five Republicans – senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and the former Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky – joining all Democrats in favor.

    I wonder which of these Republicans would still vote for this if it weren't an empty gesture.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A gesture, even an empty one, against Trump can have real consequences. He fucking threatened Canada with tarrifs over an ad he didn't like.

    So this isn't nothing, even if it's not going to produce the desired outcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • True, but I still think it's interesting to consider if some of these people wouldn't have been willing to vote for something with consequences. Or if some people who didn't vote for this would have been willing to vote for something with consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why does this only affect Brazil? Was that a separate "emergency"?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Cool canada next

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    But it is all but certain to stall in the US House

    More meaningless legislative theater. Wake me up when something actually has a chance of getting through both chambers.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    No, no, they need to feed you these pretend victories to make you believe action is happening and that is not just one giant grift that they're all in on. Be sure to donate what little you can afford so that these millionaires can continue the fight against injustice!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    And he will simply ignore that. He is King. He no longer cares for what was once "the law".

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Even if it passed the house, wouldn't Trump just veto it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 2 comments in c/theguardian_us@ibbit.at view that post
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    With the House on Mike's "don't release the Epstein files" hold, it will just sit there

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    To be clear, this will accomplish nothing.

  • source