post
Modern Christian Nationalism is more than enough of a contradiction for me to not even take this dumb cult seriously
There's another side to the cult. The one that gets people to join. They preach love and peace and tolerance. All while holding a hate book of fiction and pretending their god isn't a made-up genocidal religious maniac terrorist.
They can do that because they ignore reality. They end up funding the radical religioius terrorists, and any radical terrorists that join and want more hate - it's all waiting and set up for them.
It's not just one cult. They're all cults, and in almost the exact same way. They've been doing this crap for thousands of years, and they're good at lying.
(asking as an atheist)
Does this include laws that are no longer applicable because of Jesus' covenant?
According to Jesus none of the old laws changed. He was very clear on that.
He also strongly implied that a not-insignificant part of the old “law” were cultural traditions and compromises, rather than directives from god.
First see, this.
Matthew 22:34-40
Then this.
Mark 7:1-13
And then this.
Matthew 19:3-8
He was very clear that what he laid out in Matthew 22:34-40 was the summary of all law, and that any and all others must be derived from that. If they do not, it is just a tradition.
I found this and it says it links to the original (but the HTTPS cert is old so I didn't click through):
https://onthelineministries.com/are-contradictions-in-bible/
Its not the source but it goes through each contraction and I think for all of them argues they're not a contraction. Their arguments seem convoluted but might make sense. They're obviously committed to saying they're not contradictions so a pretty biased source but I'm guessing so was the original.
They also said some things that are in comments on the OP:
One of the funny things I noticed about this is that some (many) are actually duplicate questions and questions of such a similar nature that it is almost pointless to answer them one by one as I could group many together into one single answer.
But the fact that question #7 and question #9 are EXACTLY the same, word for word, I believe it gives a clear testimony to the deception the image attempts to give
That looks like a overlay map of solar flare activity. Coincidence? I think not.
Is this in response to a thing going around Christian circles where they say the Bible contains 65,000 hyperlinks, and humans couldn't have done that so it must have been God?
This "hyperlink" business is based on a similar graphic that someone put together and it really is pretty. Each "hyperlink" is supposedly a part of the Bible that references another part of the Bible. But I could never find their data, although they sell a print of the graphic.
I did once find a website that documented 100,000 Bible "hyperlinks" and the data there is absolutely a joke. Like, any verse that mentions the word "good" is a hyperlink to every other verse that uses that word
You would think a all powerful, all knowing, omnipresent entity would be better at proofreading his main document. 4 accounts of crucifixion/resurrection, only 1 mentions zombies (Matthew 27:52-53). I would think that event would be newsworthy enough for all of them to mention it.
It's even more frustrating when you read older tests which are often collages of even older stuff and sometimes contradict themselves from one paragraph to the other. I guess it is what it is, people thousands of years ago really wouldn't formulate things the way we do. Also the emphasis on things having to be factually true, and logically consistent, is surprisingly modern.
Truly is mind boggling that any intelligent human could consider the Bible as anything more than pure fiction/fantasy.
I think that those who have read the Bible (many self proclaimed Christians have not) understand the principle that the Bible is a collection of stories that are used for interpretation of day to day life to give them a more structured moral integrity rather than cut and dry "this is what the Bible says so there is no flexibility". Life isn't a set of hard rules to follow, the Bible gives you guidance, not rules.
That said, I'm a devout atheist. Just an observation about others from someone who was forced into Christianity, questioned it, and left.
I do feel that anyone can believe what they want to, if they feel it makes them a better person or gives them a sense of community.
Of course. Our entire society is built upon generations of knowledge instilled on us by our lineage and what they were exposed to.
Some stuff is black and white. Like hurting other people or causing pain. Things that make sense to not do because they dont feel good. But many of the other moral sensibilities, absolutely! It comes from people before us.
Believing in things that are so blatantly false does not make anyone a "better person".
That's not what I said. I said it makes them "feel" they are a better person. And I said that the Bible has teachings that can form someone into a more moral person and that the Bible is utilized by true Christians as a sort of guide to approaching life rather than taking its word as absolute fact. Much of the Bible is false, but its stories make up a moral compass and a way to live life through its meanings. There are plenty of examples of this.
Shitting on someone's beliefs doesnt make one a "better person" but acknowledging that you will never understand it yet supporting their beliefs by not forcing them into your mindset is. People are people and part of humanity is believing whatever you want to believe in. You're allowed to have differences of opinions and still care.
Yeah unfortunately when you tell the same lie a gazillion times some will actually start believing it, specially if you inject it into the minds of kids at such a young age, even if it's the dumbest shit ever
It helps if you start at your conclusions and work backwards a bit.
There is no greater commandment than to love your neighbor as yourself. That pretty much contradicts the entire Bible
I need, like, a click or hoverover-able version. I'm really curious what the repeat offenders here are.
This "beautiful" dataset contains duplicate entries (#7 and 9). There may be others, stopped reading after that.
Thank you for the due diligence, I almost cross posted this unknowingly
The text at the bottom has duplicates, sure. Do you think that's the "beautiful" part?
I think a beautiful dataset wouldn't have a duplicate entry in the first ten rows.
The duplication would result in an arc being drawn twice with exactly the same pixels. Ie, it would make no difference whatsoever to the display. It has no effect on the "beauty" part. You might as well be objecting to the font that the text is in.
Font choice is also a factor in data visualization hehe
You could literally chop the lower half of this image off and it would make no difference to the data visualization.
Not a holy book. Just fiction thrown out by stupid people thousands of years ago that had zero idea how anything at all works other than farming, fishing, and war. Not even written by the same people, or at the same times.
TLDR: You're a fucking idiot if you follow any of those bullshit lies and hate..
that had zero idea how anything at all works other than farming, fishing, and war.
They wrote these stories 2000 years ago, what should had they know about? IDK about the whole bible but in the life of jesus story there are some good passages such as preventing a woman from being stoned. The bible wasn't entirely invented out of anything, it draw influences from other traditions and philosophies that merged in the area
tl;dr: You're a fucking dangerously infectious idiot if you follow any of those bullshit lies and hate. We, as a species, need you to get better.
FTFY
To memorize this is to win every theological battle you'll never have.
Well, just fining relevant passages to "interpret" is about half of it. Writing a stirring interpretation is the other, and it helps if you have some kind of living authority to appeal to or are saying something convenient to the audience, since a lot of other people are interpreting the bible in their own way.
What's the total?
Is this why conservatives contradict themselves whenever they open their mouths?


top 69 comments