For the logical fallacies that are inherent to their message? I dunno

For the record Joan of Arc is fully supportive.

Because they view the morals America was founded on as fair and just with a few tweaks. People on one side think the white supremacy is a betrayal of the promise of equality, while others see it as based. American values can then be celebrated by both without them meaning the same thing. At the end of the day, promises of human rights and genocidal bigotry made America what it is, and so long as America is America, they always will.

I personally don't give a shit what people 200+ years ago thought, nor do I care for dogma of today.

It has been debated endlessly whether the constitution should be read literally, contemporaneously, in reference to ____. Really, it was a fairly well put together document. Solid effort, gold stars all around. But, given its quality, the constitution has been difficult to pull away from.

If you’ve ever seen what a group of kids spontaneously untethered by the rules of a game decide to do, it might offer some perspective on the coming years

Why stop there? I bet Australopethecus Anamensis wasn't supportive of trans rights as well as other modern things like having teeth beyond your 26th birthday.

Famously there are no mountain lions in not just Philadelphia but the entire state of Pennsylvania! https://extension.psu.edu/cougars-are-not-in-pennsylvania

Because Ben Franklin hunted every cougar in the state.

Ya, the dude loved older women.

What? No they didn't. Like half of them did, though.

Someone who pursues trans women out of a fetish not genuine desire to connect emotionally

Basically people who see trans people irl and think we're a porn category.