They are each great in their own way, and in their own context. I can't love one more than the other, but I love them differently.
post
I didn't even need to click the link to know what you meant.
Fun fact: When the windmill arm finger touches the mailbox, it also lights up my heart.
Damn I forgot about the truckload of energy that bass player brings in that video.
See also, Boys of Summer by the Ataris, and that one's a lot closer as Don Henley's original is nearly as good. Some might argue better, and I wouldn't disagree with them directly, but I prefer the cover.
Most cover songs, you don't know they're covers, they're that much better.
Despite being an 80s kid, my introduction to KISS was Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey, with God Gave Rock n' Roll To Ya. Later found out it was a cover. In fact, Christian group Petra, which probably rivals Fleetwood Mac for number of past members (albeit for different reasons — Petra styles itself a missionary, not a band in the traditional sense, so their revolving door of members is to be expected), covered the song before KISS did. I don't even recall who did it first.
Of course, a lot of popular songs aren't even written by the performer. The Bangles' Manic Monday was written by Prince, but there wasn't a Prince version until later. Prince never released it in his lifetime, it was released after he passed. So that wasn't a cover. Prince literally wrote the song for them and they recorded it. He recorded it too, but didn't release it. Maybe they got to hear it, but it was not made public. Still not thought of as a cover.
Prince did a lot of "ghost writing" for other artists back in the day, like way more than most people realize.
I had that Petra cd lol. I was later on like wait who wrote this kiss or petra
Neither! (Obviously. We both know that now.)
I had Beyond Belief and Unseen Power. I'm not religious, per se — but they made some good music. Back then I fell in with some Christians and they were playing Beyond Belief, and I thought it sounded awesome. I had no idea who the band were, but I bought the disc, and then the one after.
I would later (much later) come to find out that they had built an effective business of copying what was popular in secular rock to drive people to the Christian message. I felt a little cheated, but I still liked the music. I still do like the music. I don't believe as they do and I certainly don't appreciate that it's a commercial enterprise and I essentially paid for an hour of advertising... but I still like the music. And I still think the opening to Beyond Belief — the title track, I mean — is one of the coolest grooves in rock music. The band were always humble about their music — they'd tell you it's not about the craft of the music, but about praising God. But, they were all very talented musicians and they weren't churning out garbage. They made good music. So even if their intentions weren't pure, the music was good. Though, that's highly subjective.
See also, Boys of Summer by the Ataris, and that one’s a lot closer as Don Henley’s original is nearly as good. Some might argue better, and I wouldn’t disagree with them directly, but I prefer the cover.
I can only comment on this part. I don't like Don Henley's music so the cover does nothing for me.
I always wondered, is it an ant farm for alien ants, or is it an ant farm owned by aliens?
Both versions are good, but I'd have to say I prefer the AAF version. It's probably been a decade or more sine I've seen this music video, and I didn't realize just how many Michael Jackson references are in it.
I love Alien Ant Farm. Every track on their first album is wonderful. After that it starts to dip but there are still good ones in their later works.
That whole album is good too, at least i remember listening to the CD a ton back in the CD binder days. My favorite song from that album is Flesh and bone. Their drummer and bass player are great
GenX here. This is one thing me and my little kids agree on, AAF's version is superior.
I mean, one is better than the other depending on mood for me. If I'm feeling metal, I'll prefer AAF, if not, MJ.
I remember seeing this music video on MTV . At 11 years old I bought their CD from the local record shop
I definitely prefer the original, although the AAF version is right in the nostalgia sweet spot for me.
Fo shizzle.
No. Nothing tops Michael (yeah, yeah, except a kid, I get it...).
it had been a minute but they do a pretty good job.. reeeeal early 2000s expressions on the face of the bass player there
I grew up on MJ.
If you were a kid in the 90s MJ grew up on you too.... 😅.
look, Michael Jackson was a talented songwriter. I just don't like his voice.
My favorite is the white panda mashup with Baller, Shot Caller. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDripRFEajk&t=972
I had no idea what you were talking about. Might have saved a click if you mentioned what they were covering and who MJ was.
Heard there version before. Had it on a compilation in 2003. It's catchy at first and then tiring, and unlike a lot of great covers I got bored with it fast.
Weird take on a low user public forum where usually this sort of thing is encouraged, but whatever. That isn't dumbing down anything.
And I do have an opinion, I know both songs. I don't think being explicit about what you are asking is going to make anything less fun, lol.
You also could have just skipped the post and not commented if you didn't know the details but here we are.
It isn't that bad but it is 100% the worst track on that album and probably one of their worst songs (although their newest album more recently was pretty Meh)
I skip it every single time I listen to the album.
all 51 comments