I'm still baffled about the expected outcome of replacing all content creation with AI for new events or ideas, like news articles.
If there are no humans to write the story first, where are the bots going to get the new information to plagiarize?
I'm still baffled about the expected outcome of replacing all content creation with AI for new events or ideas, like news articles.
If there are no humans to write the story first, where are the bots going to get the new information to plagiarize?
The internet I loved died like 15 years ago anyway. It got replaced by ads and misinformation bots and hatred.
I'm deeply jealous of people who experienced the early internet. For me it has always been like this.
My dude, YouTube used to not have ads
And Facebook used to just literally have your friends statuses show up on it and that was it. No ads or sponsored content.
But I’m also old enough to remember when getting somewhere involved using a map and asking for directions at gas stations.
But I’m also old enough to remember when getting somewhere involved using a map and asking for directions at gas stations.
Man, for all the advancements in technology, I fucking did this last week lmao.
My GPS was telling me to "continue to the intersection of Grand and 12th" then "take the third exit in the roundabout" when Grand and 12th was a stoplight and there was no roundabout in sight.
I experienced a weird middle period because my parents had kids really late in their lives compared to most people. I experienced a lot of old tech because they liked to hold on to it. I remember my parents using maps to get around on a road trip and remember our VHS player but the first console I used was an xbox (though they never let me own a console 😔) and, because my parents were concerned about internet access, I didn't get online until quite late in life compared to my peers. So I am very familiar with the old tech native to the millenial and gen X generations but have only experienced the internet post centralization. Bless my parents for keeping me offline as long as they did, I think this was a net good, but damn it I wish I could have experienced the wild west age of the internet. It wish being online felt like an exploration.
Facebook was only glorious when it was made for college kids. The restricting of boomers and children was what made it great. It was the perfect app to boost/record the college experience.
Dude I saw a group of college-aged kids walking on the sidewalk using their GPS. I mean even if you're new to the city, don't you know the basics of NSEW, how addresses work? I felt like an alien telling them that if you're at 1234 Ste-Catherine, well, 1234 Maisonneuve is just one street up that way. What the hell do you need a portable satellite-based navigation system for?
The only time in my life I have ever seen ads on youtube is when I've watched videos on someone else's computer or through "smart" TVs.
I am genuinely shocked that anyone puts up with it. Then again, I get it, not everybody knows how to get around it, and, more importantly, they are working very hard and will succeed at eliminating the possibility to circumvent it.
I learned if you report an ad for being offensive it cancels all the ads after as well as ending the current ad immediately. And it just takes an extra 2 seconds and 3 clicks. Works on smart tvs, phones, and my Xbox.
I don’t even feel like I’m lying because ads inherently are offensive to me.
Oh my sweet young man. The internet in the early days was very open source and about proving connectivity, at least with the little people like us. Monetization drove people away like crazy and we segregated to places that didn’t have crazy pop up porn ads every time we clicked on something.
In my opinion Bill Gates is the most responsible for ruining the internet. He used his money to go around to universities and governments and private entities around the world and convince them to start monetizing what used to be all open source hobby work that was bettering mankind.
It actually cost them a couple of billion a year to run it. Goal was to monopolize online video distribution before monetizing.
Yes and the earliest meme was to comment "FAKE!" under every video. Now they are.


"You don't really know what it is you have until it's gone. Gone...gone."
People say that early internet was like the wild west, and I agree. And I feel like a weathered old cowboy who saw my homestead on the frontier get surrounded by buildings, cars, industries, smog, noise, and the never ending growth of the population.
Capitalism fucked us all, and it keeps fucking us, and it will kill us.
In the early days, there were a lot of porn ads before ad blockers came along. There’s a nice sweet spot somewhere between that invention and the internet of today.
I was there when people when people were sending around Goatse pics and all our info came from Alta Vista.
It was pretty sweet, apart from the prolapse.
I lived through the transition from BBSes to the publicly available internet. I had to go in person to pick up the equipment and software on a floppy.
The first thing I found was the Church of the Subgenius which I found hilarious.
Hate to disagree but like this is the Internet and it’s pretty great and there are no ads and most of us are not bots and there’s a lot of love here
Lemmy is an exception to the rule.
I love love love model collapse. It's the absolute perfect conclusion to our Internet and this AI bubble.
The make AI. They realize that we're not ready for it. But short term profits overlook any and all ethical concerns. So they business bro and release anyway, unleashing a flood of slop and garbage content. All of which is impossible to tell if it is human made or not. But the only way to make their business continue is to train new models, which needs more human created content, of which they already destroyed and made imperceivable from their slop.
It's honestly just pure poetic justice. The ones who are hiring the next generation of AI models are AI companies.
Explains why my personal blog, wiki, and git repo keep getting hammered by hordes of AI company scrapers. If AI was intelligent, they'd download a single snapshot every month or so and share. But no, eight different scrapers using thousands of different IP addresses (to evade my fail2ban measures) each have to follow every single blame and diff link when a simple git clone operation would get them the hundreds of megabytes of content in one go.
They are getting better, though. More hits are to RecentChanges on my wiki, so there seem to be some optimizations going on. But I refuse to increase my operating costs beyond a few USD/month to serve AI bots when I know barely anyone human visits.
The open internet will become divided into verified websites, and the rest will be left for bots to fight on forever.
It will be used as an excuse by our governments to force a ID verification system tied to your real life person, refuse it and fight it in every possible way.
Meanwhile we need enclaves of not corporate bullshit (like fedi but also) including bringing back webrings and old school chats. And usenet. And irl word of mouth.
Because fuck all that shit.
I mean, verification doesn't really help because in the end it's still mostly human posting the AI slop (I think).
That said, we'll probably need some sort of reputation system. Something like a revamped GPG or Web Of Trust, where you a) can tag users/websites you find trustworth and b) can see what other people you trust think about someone/something.
So at this point we're gonna have to go back to reading books...
Books made before 2019. Amazon is absolutely filled with AI generated books nowadays.
In fact, this whole "consume media only from 2010 and earlier" idea is getting more appealing by the day. I'd rather watch an anime from the 80's where each frame was drawn by a human hand and somebody spent a week encoding it to extract all the details from the original analogue source, and the subtitles were made by a person who considered each nuance carefully as if their life depended on it, rather than watch a 2025 sequel to a prequel to a reboot of an existing IP where half the assets are AI, the subtitles are AI, the script is AI, and it's just the most generic mass appealing thing ever made.
It's pretty sad, creepy and hopeless, but this is exactly how I have been feeling lately with YouTube videos. If it's made post GPT, I am not inclined to watch it unless it's a channel I know has a stated anti-AI position, because at least then I know I'm getting human input. They are building up Plato's cave around us stone by stone, we can't even move out of the way, we are getting imprisoned, and the few of us who see it happening and shout are being drowned out by the noise of the billions around us who happily hum along.
The system itself needs to come down, with violence, or we won't make it, none of us, and honestly even if it does, I am not sure we are going to survive. I feel like I'm playing the fiddle on the Titanic.
The 80s and 90s have some of my favorite anime, movies, and tv shows anyway. I can't really think of any recent masterpeices aside from Interstellar and The Martian.
If you are a USian then you probably have access to a public library.
If you go to the website of said library, usually a city.gov or countystate.gov, you can create an account.
After you create said account, you can download apps(they will tell you but normally Libby or Hoopla, Hoopla hasn't been work for me but might be a me issue.).
Use the ID from the website on the apps and you can check out books to read. You also have access to comics and audiobooks. The Invincible comic is good, you should check it out.
Weird that third party apps, made by corporate entities, are needed for this. They're public libraries funded with public money, it should be one unified backend with libre applications.
Then the libraries would have to pay for hosting, so they'd have to be the ones selling user data to advertisers and stuff. Hence the extra degree of separation / "plausible deniability"
If the hivemind cared about actual important priorities (instead of just the desire for low oil prices), then the Internet Archive would face more pressure to improve its infrastructure and the authorities would face more pressure to leave the Internet Archive tf alone.
Nostr can fix this someday
Then the libraries would have to pay for hosting, so they’d have to be the ones selling user data to advertisers and stuff. Hence the extra degree of separation / “plausible deniability”
What? Libraries don't sell data to advertisers to acquire, maintain and lend books. Why would they do that to provide ebooks? You unitedstatians got used to this bizarre mix of private corporations and public services and ended up accepting the premise that it's somehow mandatory.
I'm not accepting the premise, that's why I use nostr on the internet and actual library buildings off the internet.
But it is mandatory, whether that's acceptable or not. Authorities in the US aren't gonna suddenly change their mind when it's your local librarian instead of the Internet Archive trying to run things differently from the corporations. The librarian needs better infrastructure to stand up to the authorities and break away from the corporate way
You likely need to physically go to the library and prove your residency but yes. Then you can do the above.
How is it a crisis? I'm expecting/hoping LLMs will just get increasingly worse as they are fed on their own slop, until they collapse into unusability and the world finally returns to sanity.
The crisis is that companies will have to pay fair prices for human labor again, which will lead to less profits for the precious shareholders
The crisis is that if the internet is bad enough that they can't train LLMs on it, it's also useless for us human. And if the LLMs leave because there is no information and we come back, eventually we will generate enough content that it will be worth it again
This is said as though it isn't an immensely expensive endeavour to run these things and the only reason they're this prevalent right now is the overspeculation and starved growth of US tech companies.
I don't get the point you are trying to make. I never said any of that. my point is that the information crisis caused by LLMs that they are referring to, affects everyone. Nothing else. Not hidden meanings
Your original comment sparks fear that failure of LLMs as a mass producer of knowledge would only be temporary until humans repopulated the internet with quality content.
Why would they come back after they fail if it costs billions of dollars to run them in the first place? You literally just agreed with someone else making the same point. Jfc.
I don't have time to write (and filter out) my opinions right now, but basically I think LLMs will find their place and will settle into a duopoly or tripoloy
I didn't ask for them.
You really did. But whatever.
Eventually is doing some heavy lifting. The costs of these data centers and the power plants to run them has to come from somewhere.
I don't know if or when the chickens come home to roost, but it could go badly for the US and China to find out their spent trillions to make a million versions of AI shrimp Jesus.
I want to believe that the silver lining is that HOPEFULLY MAYBE (Now these words are doing the heavy lifting. For sure)this will mean that when the ai craze goes away they will have spent so much on infrastructure that we will great cheap energy, cloud computing, and GPUs.
The Hapsburg chin of the digital age
Its almost like its predictable outcome of prediction algorithms being used to generate content
In part, this is what Microsoft Recall is about: scraping end users' data at will to sort and feed to its LLMs, without the user ever seeing what is being scraped or having any real, lasting ability to shut Recall off and keep it shut down.
While I am aware that MS insists none of that is true, it is fact that 1) the snapshotted and OCR'd Recall data is now stored in an encrypted database that takes higher than average user skill to get into; 2) even users who turned off Recall saw it turned on again at the next Windows Update; and 3) even after MS said they were backing off Recall, MS continued to partner with hardware makers to create computers bundled with Windows 11 on top of the extra GPU necessary for processing all these Recall snapshots without making that sluggish Windows bloat even more sluggishly bloated than it already was.
So why all that money and effort, even as they claimed to be backing away from it, just to help a hypothetically forgetful user here and there? Data harvesting was always part of the payoff, why they were and are very willing to piss off a huge part of their own consumer base around the world by ending Windows 10 unnecessarily, and why even now they keep ramming Recall shit down the pipe when literally NO ONE wants it.
They get your data. At will. And as much of it as they like, without you ever having the opportunity to oversee what they're getting, much less curate it. And after feeding it to their LLMs, they get to aggregate and broker it to their "partners" as well. Never forget what MS did in Palestine and the partners they can and will gladly work with, all based on massive collections of quietly gathered user data that either should not legally exist, or is not known outside of MS and its partners to exist at all.
Not because of this, mostly climate collapse, but yeah
To be fair, this is also part of the problem. AI is making climate change faster, even leaving aside the social ramifications of living in a post-truth world.
But that doesn't count the climate solutions AI will come up with!
/s
I feel bad for millenials in their 30-40s who do not have unreplaceable expertize.
top 100 comments