Toasters, kettles, stoves, ovens…

all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 40 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Wait till OP finds out that most of cooking is putting heat into food.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago
    [–] 41 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    If you really think about it. All any appliance does is turn energy into heat.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Saying that all appliances turn energy to heat is true, but saying that all appliances do is turn energy in to heat is not. While heat is still a byproduct, lots of appliances make things move as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    For heat pumps, the thing they're moving is heat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They’re really moving refrigerant. It’s just that the refrigerant keeps changing temperature (heating up at one end of the journey and cooling down at the other end).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And what is that movent? Eventually decays into heat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I understand that, and called it out in my comment. Heat being a byproduct of movement does not mean that a device that creates movement "only" creates heat. That's like saying all drink dispensers only dispense piss, because what does it eventually turn in to?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Why stop at appliances? By that logic, humans are nothing more than self-propelled heaters. The whole universe is nothing but shifting pockets of heat like the ripples of a pond bouncing back and forth until they all disappear.

    Such nihilism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    There was a paper floating around about a decade ago. Basically it was asserting that biological life is the natural outcome of entropy itself. Bc living beings are especially good at increasing entropy over time. Not sure if it was credible but a fun idea nontheless

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    False. My water filter pitcher does not turn energy into heat.

    (Ok, fine, it uses gravity to move the water through a filter, which technically converts some of the potential energy of the water into heat through friction, but that’s not something the pitcher does, that’s something the earth does that the pitcher uses to its advantage.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Not an appliance, that's a tool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oooh I love debating semantics. Is a sieve an appliance? A slotted spoon? They both work in the same way as your water filter.

    Common usage of the quantifier kitchen appliances indicates use of electricity. I would describe my electric coffee grinder as a small appliance, but not my mortar and pestle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Yes, kitchen appliance usually means powered by gas or electricity, but if something is powered by gravity, it’s still an outside power source. So that’s what I would say the difference is.

    A mortar and pestle is powered by your own movement. A filter pitcher is powered by gravity. So I would say that it’s an appliance because of that. A sieve and a slotted spoon are a harder delineation, since they both are partially powered by gravity. I would say that because they have no moving parts, they are not machines, and so may not be considered appliances, but that’s only my own thoughts, not a dictionary definition requirement. Topologically, a sieve and a filter pitcher are basically the same thing. So that’s a conundrum.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Refrigerators use electricity to move heat from inside the box to outside the box.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    It’s too bad that there’s no way to recapture the waste heat from an oven/range in the summertime. Like to heat our water when the bread has finished cooking. Maybe future homes could run a recirculating water pipe behind the oven you could switch on and off?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    what you're describing is an oven with a heat pump. industrial-grade ovens like this exist, but they don't really exist in the home appliance market as the amount of energy recaptured at that scale would be negligable. it's easiere (and cheaper) to make ovens more energy efficient in other ways.

    there are a number of other home appliances (washers, dryers, and dishwashers), however, which use inverter heat pumps to recapture/recycle heat, thus increasing energy efficiency by quite a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Not as fancy as heat pumps but our kettle boils one cup at a time and the boiling chamber is under the water tank. Some of the wasted energy goes to warm up the water in the tank meaning less energy is needed for the next cup. It's probably not that efficient but it's better than nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Considering that heat rises, I’d be pretty surprised if the heating element for an electric kettle was anywhere but beneath the tank. It wouldn’t work very well otherwise, unless you used a much more expensive method of heating it all around., But even then, there would still be heating elements underneath.

    A good way to improve efficiency there, would be to insulate the tank to reduce heat dissipation in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't think I explained very well. It has two tanks. Storage water tank and a boiling tank which is under the storage tank. It draws water into the boiling tank which is 1 cup size. Once it's hot it shoots the water out of the spout into the cup. Water from the storage tank fills the boiling tank.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    You're reusing the heat to warm the house normally. Obv, you don't always want that, so you may opt to limit using the oven in summer for example, as it is the one which runs the longest.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I concluded a while back that if you make some sort of miracle machine that handles both heating stuff and water stuff you can replace a ridiculous amount of appliances and much other stuff too. Everything from a stove to a car wash. Soldering irons and showers too.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago

    “Heating and water stuff” — that’s basically every form of power in the world safe solar and hydro. they all generally rely on creating steam to move a turbine, even nuclear.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Where I live everything is electric for the vast majority of people. The norm here is to have electric stoves and electric water heaters. Even heating houses is mainly done through electricity.

    I was so surprised to learn as a teen that this is not the norm everywhere, and that some people are actually still lighting fires in their houses to cook food.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A gas hob is so much better than an electric hob.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Sure. It's always "better" to burn stuff to generate more pollution in the air that you breathe, and also continue to depend on fossil fuel.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/gas-stoves-air-pollution-1.6394514

    And "better" depends on your sources of energy and what your goals are. Like most people here, I grew up with an electric stove and we are just used to cook this way. It's just an adaptation. I use gas stoves in camping and in my cabin, and I'm so used to an electric one, that I hate using gas.

    Electricity here is cheap and clean so if you want to eat hot and warm food and minimize the impact on the environment, and your bank account, you should probably get used to cooking with electricity. There's also different technologies. My mother prefers a glass-ceramic stove but induction stoves are also getting pretty popular. Or you can pay more, pollute more, continue to breathe the results of combustion and keep buying fossil fuel to cook "better". I consider less pollution for millions of people, and less reliance on the oil & gas industry to be "better".

    For more facts about this, you can just watch an hour long video on that very topic from Technology Connextras.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just heard the quote, 'Toasters weren't invented to make toast, they were invented to sell electricity.'

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    That's silly, they really don't use much power in the grand scheme of things. It uses a lot of power for a very short period, a small blip. Big power consumption comes from things that run often or all the time. It compounds.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Electric to heat has really good energy conversion efficiency.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    And in the summer, we look at all that and say "no thanks, I'm going to go outside and use good old fashioned fire."

  • source