What disturbs me is that things of this same sort certainly happen today, and we as consumers are likely just as blind to it as they were then
post
When you're concerned about BPAs, so you put a lead lining on all your Tupperware.
Did they get double cancer or did the 2 cancers cancel each other out?
Legally not allowed to have two at the same time
Hell yeah, asbestos cigarette filters.




With advertising like that I'm moving to Kent too. Fuck off Marlboro
Probably better than the microplastics from modern filters...
They tried to reduce the health effects of smoking asbest as they could.
We knew in 1918 that asbestos workers died at a high frequency, and in 1924 Asbestosis was described.
They used blue asbestos, which is most likely to cause mesothelioma. So technically, at least, it did indeed accomplish the goal.
Depending on the state of science at that point, that may actually have been a good idea.
Source? Yeah, I could use a web search, but I’d expect a source for a claim that would be even mildly interesting.
Here's one as well as a fact check
Thank you. These kinds of things keep on being horrifying.
Again, I did search this up myself as well, but in my opinion the op should provide a source as well as the catchy (and horrifying) pic.
Might still make it slightly less unhealthy overall
I'm saying cigarettes are so terrible that freebasing asbestos is somehow healthier






all 21 comments