top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 177 points 1 year ago (32 children)
  • [–] 78 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    IS IT SO MUCH TO ASK FOR A PHONE THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED AND SURVIVE LIFE!?

    sorry to yell. i just feel like i'm going crazy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Fairphone is the closest we have. It's trivial to replace battery and other components.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [+] -18 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    swear to god, it can't cost as much to add a headphone jack as big e-waste is trying to convince us it does. i won't outright dismiss a phone because it doesn't have a headphone jack, but it's crazy to me that budget phones still have them and "nice" phones don't

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I'd love to have a fairphone, but none of their phones seem to have a home button, and they also have that stupid thing where the selfie camera is on the screen...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    so long as the corners are sloped/rounded, phones can be like 1cm thick no problem, and i truly do not understand the obsession with thinner phones

    our hands are curved, why do people want a bunch of empty space between the palm and the phone? might as well fill that space with battery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That was basically how the pre-lenovo Motorola phones were all built. Take the Nexus 6 for example, the edges were really thin, only a few mm, but the back curved so at the middle it was nearly a cm thick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That phone was a goddamn tank I dropped my Nexus 6 down a flight of concrete stairs without a case and by some miracle only the plastic on one corner was scratched. I stopped at HTC One down those exact same stairs and it disintegrated before it hit stair 3.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Its honestly all making me think I should build a palmtop and shove a 5g module in it. Screw text messaging (matrix), screw phone service (I'll just set up VoIP), who needs a play store when ive got apt repos.

    I don't care if it feels like 2007 in my pocket. I'll stick an 18650 or two in there and swap it when I need to. I can even be more ridiculous and make the keyboard mechanical.

    To answer your question before its asked, yes, there is plenty wrong with me. Still though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    I don't even know what I'd use an aux port for at this point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Better headphones than Bluetooth ones, at a fraction of the price, and without a built in death date due to the batteries (permanently) dying?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I know what you mean, but just in case anyone has a pair of these I feel obligated to mention it’s relatively trivial to replace the battery packs inside, so maybe don’t just throw them away.

    Or do, whatever, more free electronics for me ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Bone conduction bluetooth headphones has me. I have some audio processing issues, and being able to hear people on the phone... I'll never go back

    I'm no audiophile and honestly can just grab my old ipod and wired headphones if I really wanna jam, or usbc-aux dongle with my phone. But my use case tends to be more forgiving than some

    Bluetooth in-ear buds can get fucked. Never found an earpiece that stays in... they're just not for me. Wired or bone conduction for me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    i mean sure, but the problem is that you then have a wire to worry about. I feel like bluetooth has been standard for so long that everyone has forgotten how incredibly annoying wired headphones are..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Still using wired headphones here. They're great. Have to use the fucking USBC adapter, but it's worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Does cord noise bother you? The last few times I've tried to use wired headphones, I was incredibly annoyed by the sounds created by the cord touching stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Are you using a smooth / rubber cord or one of those rough, braided cords? I usually use modified KOSS headphones and some Verisonix cups. They've all got smooth cords, so I almost never notice if it touches things, but I'm mostly wearing on-ear / open backed headphones that wouldn't likely transmit that too much.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    You can buy non-microphonic cables for pretty cheap. Bought a 7€ hama cable for an old pair of Philips 2xhr headphones and it was completely silent.

    IEM/earbud cables are a little trickier, but there are plenty of sub 20€ cables online that are good. Microphonics is only really a problem with carelessly designed or very cheaply made cables.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago

    Im a wired headphones person and even I think that battery death is a bullshit reason.

    The jack jack has a finite number of uses, as does the flexibility of the wire, many other components also aren't indestructible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Does this really sell phones? Why don't you make it match the camera bump, even just a little bit and give us back the aux and maybe more battery life.

    Of course they won't do that because then they wouldn't have an excuse to force us to buy their expensive bluetooth earbuds.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    My new phone that I got as a gift doesn't have a jack. I'm so petty and frugal about it that rather than ordering a wireless earbud set, I instead ordered the cheapest jack to usb-c dongle I found that wasn't on Temu. It works a charm. I will NEVER buy wireless headphones.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Argh I hate those bumps. My phone has one and it can't lay evenly on any surface because of this >:(

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago*

    My current phone has a slight camera bump but it has less thickness than the case so that's no problem for me. The thicker bumps are not acceptable IMO. Although I don't care quite as much about that as I do about the hole punch in the screen for a selfie cam. My current phone also has a bezel selfie camera like in the civilized old days.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    A lens (the bottom one that hits the ground first) cracked the first week I got my iPhone 16, setting it down on a glass table.

    Its a hairline crack, but still.

    And it was in a case, but the bump is so freaking big the camera barely sticks out.

    Meanwhile my old HTC and Razer phones (and old iPhones) never had this problem... Oh, but I forgot, they were a millimeter thicker and non-rectangles, therefore unusable?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Thks is what happens when you let the marketing dept. have even a taste of alcohol.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I suspect its main purpose is not to be a product in its own right but a tech demo of half the thickness of a folding iPhone when it arrives. Being a niche product for early adopters and fashion victims to be seen with is a secondary purpose.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I hear you but there are limits for the average user. The worst on a smartphone is already more quality than I need to film a meandering vacation video that no one will ever see or to take a photo of my mom with the end of my index finger

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It has slimmed down to a gentle flat plane ... and due to underground tectonic forces, a small ridge is forming that will grow to become a mountain range in future versions

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That is kinda what drives me away from the Xiaomi 14/15 Ultra. Amazing camera, but even with a case it sticks out, and I drop phones all the time.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago*

    Also,

    • iphone air: 156 x 74 x 5.64mm
    • iphone 13 mini: 131.5 x 64.2 x 7.65mm

    How about bring back the best phone you ever made you cowards.

    Meh, whatever, I'll just not buy a phone then. Should be the best choice for many other reasons too.

  • source
  • [–] 73 points 1 year ago (27 children)

    Though amusing, I feel it's worth noting this image had to go back over a decade—eleven years—to find an iPhone without a camera bump of some kind, and would have to go back 6 years to get a pro-level camera without a plateau of some kind.

    I agree that a dual measurement should be included, body thickness and camera plateau, but it never has been, so here we are.

    And to give credit where it's due, I have no desire to own an iPhone Air, but it IS a bit of astonishing engineering. They've used the plateau to provide a place for the logic board, and turned basically the entire body into a battery to preserve decent battery life. Love 'em or hate 'em, Apple has a world-class engineering team.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    an amazing engineering achievement for sure, but i just wonder what consumer wanted thinner phones.

    I'd buy an iphone immediately if they gave me a chunky phone that lasted a week on a single charge. now THAT would be an engineering achievement lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Apparently both this one and the Samsung one are selling well, so... Somebody does.

    This has come and gone. Feature phones had their thin&light phase, too. And it suits the manufacturers because they're doing this work to make foldables anyway, so selling the thin candybar is a free side gig. Which is probably needed, because to riff on your point, what consumer wants to spend 2K on a bad tablet with a plastic screen that folds into a mediocre phone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm getting my pixel fold 10 next week 😭

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Yeah, see? There is a market for it, just like there is a market for an unnecessarily thin candybar.

    Is it a mainstream device that everybody wants? No, but some people do like it.

    And hey, I 'm not berating you for it. I like weird tech and I'm willing to overpay for it. At this point the only reason to ever buy a new phone is your old phone broke... or you want something fun and weird and are willing to overpay for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    A lot of people buy the latest Samsung and Apple just because they're new and a status symbol to them. I don't think it's a good metric for week wants what.

    I do think many people want thin for various reasons, just doing think it's valid proof.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    It's not really astonishing, that's Apple's marketing speaking. Phones have been thinner than this and the tech that Apple are using now already exists in many phones. Apple are great at selling something as new and innovative, their marketing is what is astonishing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Please name phones that are identical to this one. If just a single measurement is off, spoiler: I'm right!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    If you follow the phone market, then there's lots of phones that have new technologies before Apple. That's always been the case.

    If you want a thin flagship example that you couldn't find yourself, then the Galaxy S25 Edge, is 5.8mm, with a smaller camera bump, better main camera, plus an ultrawide, is lighter, has more SIM support, higher resolution and brighter display, USB 3, bigger battery and faster charging.

    The iPhone Air is not astonishing at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    The vivo X5Max was 4.8 mm, the Moto Z was 5.19mm thick, also bonus, the S25 Edge is actually 0.7mm thinner than the iPhone Air if you measure at the camera. But why are you being dense? Nobody is arguing the thinness, but that it's not an astonishing engineering feat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Yeah this marketing is what makes the iphone 17 probably one of the best phones available atm IMO:

    https://security.apple.com/blog/memory-integrity-enforcement/

    This probably wipes out 90% of all classes of vulnerabilities that can be exploited on a device. Its crazy engineering. No other phones on earth have this protection.

    Android phones have something called MTE that is a basic version of this, but due to performance issues, isnt really feasible to have enabled all the time unlike MIE.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This is an insane fucking blog post considering Apple has been far more vulnerable to "mercenary exploits" than flagship Android devices. Regardless of the actual feature they are describing, the several paragraphs of discussion on this topic frankly reads as unhinged.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    And if only if it was just 1 mm thicker, or maybe 2, the battery could have been user replaceable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I miss replaceable batteries. I replace mine myself but current phones all glue in and do waterproofing so it's a real pain and it's never quite the same. Don't let people blame the form factor or waterproofing, though, a replaceable battery is always technically possible-- there's just no incentive for companies to do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Replaceable battery is always going to have a tradeoff. It’s usually a combination of reduced waterproofing, reduced battery capacity, and reduced durability of the case. Until we invent Star Trek transporters or replicators that can replace the battery without opening the phone, this is always going to be the case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    They can absolutely waterproof all of the working bits separately from the battery. The battery does not need to be in the same enclosure. It could even be attached with the same kind of waterproofing glue to protect the connection but would be easier to remove and replace than taking the entire phone apart.

    The reason they don't do it is because it requires slightly more thickness and makes it feasible for people to replace the battery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    The person I was replying to said “don’t blame the form factor or waterproofing” and my comment assumed identical thickness between replaceable and non-replaceable battery phones.

    Once you make the thickness variable then all of the other tradeoffs go out of whack. After all, you could make a phone the size of a brick and have a battery that lasts for months but would anyone but a few niche users actually buy that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The problem is acting like everything has to be extremes instead of acknowledging that a small change allows for a lot more options. Like why bring up a brick sized phone as a response to 'slightly thicker' except to be a contrarian?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Because you can always make the argument “it should be slightly thicker for another x% battery life” on to infinity. But actually drawing a line and saying “it should be exactly this thick because this is the correct amount of battery life” is actually really difficult.

    From what I’ve seen, people want replaceable batteries because they go through their battery a lot faster than the average person. That’s always going to be a difficult sell because now you’re talking about less than half of the market.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Mobile phones are such a tiny market, no room for appealing to different needs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Loads of companies sell loads of different styles of phones, yet replaceable batteries are quite rare nowadays. You’d think if this was such an important market niche they’d be right on it! I guess not…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    i have been an Android user through and through. Don't want to give an enny to the giant oligopoly spearhead if i can help it...

    Anyways, my colleague had bought an iPhone 6 an year after it was released. I remember to this day vividly, we were in the elevator, we were talking about it. He took it out, I held his iPhone 6 in my hand, and it was the most surreal experience I have had with technology up until that point.

    It just felt Unbelievable, Unreal, to see a phone so lightweight, so thin, so compact, and not be a toy/downscaled dummy unit. Even the curved sides, which were aesthetically unappealing at first in photos, just clicked when I actually held the phone in my own hand.

    It's been almost a decade, and still I feel like I have never seen a smartphone that had such a perfect in hand feeling.

    Don't get me wrong, I didn't buy it because Android just had too much going for it and for my preference and use case, iOS never was going to be a consideration. But for a fleeting moment, I really envied my colleague for having one of the best feeling smartphones at the time.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Apple is great when it comes to design and aesthetics. Jobs was known for being great at conveying a feeling in his presentations, and their products were always aimed at a "it just works, don't worry about how" crowd. It's no wonder they were copied left and right (slide to unlock, round corners etc., as ridiculous as some of those patents are).

    That said, I feel like Android and iOS have come ever closer to equality. Google is locking down their walled garden, both app stores have basically become useless - apps are just custom browsers to webpages now and games suuuuck - with the exception that Apple's walled garden enables compilation and therefore better battery efficiency, which in turn makes phones lighter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    As someone who just updated from an iPhone SE2020, the same body as the iPhone 6, I waited for the iPhone Air, no other iPhone had interest because of weight. This is the new standard.

    People keep forgetting how stupid heavy carrying so much battery all the time.

    iPhone Air charges from 25% -> 80% in 30min or less.

    Camera is excellent and beyond my expectations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sure and since there is already a bump for the camera making it slightly thicker for more battery or a removable battery isn't ruining a perfectly flat surface.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    at this point we're not talking about good cameras, we're talking about having fucking telescopes built into the phone.

    I have a pixel 6a and the camera is absolutely fine, i have taken perfectly good images on it and that's with me specifically removing any sort of automatic software enhancements it might have when running the stock OS.

    With modern technology even a phone without a camera bump will be so monstrously good 99% of people are never going to make full use of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    How are you feeling about your 6a these days? Did you do the battery replacement? I don't really want to but I'm also not super thrilled about the reduced battery life considering that was one of the weakest points of it to start with. And Android 16 is not running as smoothly as previous versions did for me. But I don't really feel like it's in such condition that it needs replaced yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    i bought it second hand and haven't given a rat's ass about the battery thing, everything has been working fine for like 3 years now and with me limiting the charge to between 30-70% the battery is still at almost 100% capacity.

    I also use lineageos so everything just keeps working smoothly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    LOL unfortunately optics don't scale.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›