The eSafety Committee has requested that multiple platforms identify themselves as 'social networking sites that put children at risk.' The companies and organizations requested to be identified are:

・Meta(Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp) ・Snap (Snapchat) ・TikTok ・YouTube ・X Roblox ・Pinterest ・Discord ・Lego Play ・Reddit ・Kick ・GitHub ・HubApp ・Match ・Steam ・Twitch

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 1 year ago

"GIMME UR IDS 😈"

-Sincerely, your friendly neighborhood government 🤗

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    This keeps getting more insane

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    GitHub, hahah. Teenagers these days. The government must be concerned about the psychosocial harm caused by unaccepted pull request.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    i assume they are referring to the conglomerate that owns most dating sites

    Match Group (wiki link)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's the only thing on the list that has reason to be restricted lol the rest should be parental discretion

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Even so the police should detect crime and prove then punish.

    Allowing lazy cops to do collective punishment without evidence is risky.

    That said I'd happily ban all those webshites for all people, not just kids. But that's probably why I'd never be granted a democratic mandate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 6 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Ah yes, all the kids chatting in the PR comments as they merge more porn into their git repos.

    Clearly Australia has some savvy folks in charge.

    (Hint: it's actually in order to restrict access to code and tools to bypass censorship)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I hate this whole social media ban, but this is a self assessment to determine if they are a social media platform which probably won't apply to GitHub. From The Register -

    "At first glance, GitHub will not have to deny service to Australians under 16 years of age, because the criteria that require a platform to do so are:

    Having the sole, or a significant purpose, of enabling online social interaction between two or more end-users;
    Allowing users to link to, or interact with, other end-users;
    Allowing users to post material on the service;
    Hosting material that is accessible to, or delivered to, end-users in Australia"
    

    And anyway, the ban only applies to logged in accounts, so you can still visit sites without being logged in without restrictions. At least, initially. The whole thing is such a waste of time and money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    "We've completed our investigation of ourselves and have found we've done nothing wrong."

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Good, seriously, fuck github.

  • source